Laserfiche WebLink
<br />deminimus in terms of what we are trying to accomplish. Or, the Planning Commission can <br />recommend approval with the exclusion of the overlay section and direct staff to identify a <br />replacement parcel. Chairperson Nixt stated since the moratorium is up in September, the <br />preferred course of action would be to make a recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated the other overlay areas may adequately cover even with the <br />exception of this one parcel. <br /> <br />Dennis Carpenter reported that at the recent NAB convention, a manufacturer was showing new <br />monopole designs that look like big white pine trees and you cannot see the antennas. He offered <br />to share that information with staff. He informed Mr. Enstrom that red lights are not required if <br />the tower is under 200 feet in height. <br /> <br />Andy Hillibregt asked about the overlay system and why the City did not leave it up to the <br />individual landowners. He stated that a 2.5 acre lot will accommodate such a tower and it should <br />be left up to the property owner if they want a tower. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill explained that a 2.5 acre commercial or industrial lot may be <br />appropriate but it would not be appropriate within a residential area. He noted that residential <br />parcels were excluded except for areas where needed to provide coverage. He stated he believes <br />there would be a lot public feedback against doing such with a residential parcel. <br /> <br />Andy Hillibregt noted some of the areas could be developed in the future and when that happens <br />the tower would be in the middle of the residential area anyway. <br /> <br />Andy Hillibregt stated his preference to allow the property owners to make the decision whether <br />they want to be included in the overlay district since they better know their property. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated leaving it open to that level of discretion would end with a result that <br />residents and the City would not be pleased with, in aggregate. <br /> <br />Andy Hillibregt suggested they work with the residents to decide which parcels should be <br />identified. He noted that as density increases the towers will be lowered and more will be <br />needed. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated staff tried to anticipate that, noting the additional locations <br />along the Mississippi River areas. The gaps in service in the central area of Ramsey were also <br />identified. He noted that technology will be changing and the City will have to adjust the <br />ordinances accordingly. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked who defines the coverage area and adequacy. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill explained providers are required to research locations within a one- <br />mile radius and that is the basis for determining the overlay. He stated staff talked with service <br />providers about their service areas, which is the basis for the one-mile radius. <br /> <br />Planning Commission / July 10,2008 <br />Page 13 of 17 <br />