Laserfiche WebLink
<br />12. That the Applicant is proposing to install two additional directional, ground signs that would be 16 <br />square feet in area per sign, and seven feet, nine inches in height. . <br /> <br />13. That the Applicant is also proposing to install a new, larger dynamic display sign on the existing <br />pylon sign for the Subject Property, which will exceed the maximum square footage allowed for <br />sign face, but will not exceed the percentage of a sign allowed for dynamic display. <br /> <br />14. That the City has, in the past, approved requests to exceed sign size restrictions allowed by City <br />. < . <br />Code. <br /> <br />15. That the proposal will/will not gr.ant the Applicant special privileges that are denied to other <br />properties in the commercial area. <br /> <br />16. That the proposal will/will not be designed so as to be harmonious and appropriate in appearance <br />with the existing or intended character of the vicinity and will/will not change the essential character <br />ofthe area. . <br /> <br />17. That the proposal will/will not adversely impact traffic in the area; <br /> <br />18. That the proposed incn::ase in sign surface area and height will/will not be unduly dangerous or <br />otherwise detrimeptal to persons residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public <br />welfare. <br /> <br />19. That the proposal will/will not substantially impair the use, enjoyment, or market value of any <br />surrounding property. <br /> <br />20. That the proposal will/will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future neighboring uses. <br /> <br />21. That the proposal will/will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for. public <br />\facilities and services, and it will/will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. <br /> <br />22. That the proposal will/will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to aily persons, <br />property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of glare. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />. and the following were absent: <br /> <br />whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Ramsey City Council this the <br />21st day of October, 2008. . <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #08-10-~ <br />Page 2 of2 <br /> <br />26 <br />