My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/14/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 10/14/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:35:58 AM
Creation date
10/10/2008 2:44:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/14/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
person and has made adjustments to her home to accommodate the situation. He stated <br />that the bottom line, in his opinion, is to look at the dogs here and he doesn't have a <br />problem with the small dogs. He stated that he would look at this different if this was <br />five black labs running around because he agrees with Councilmember Dehen that can be <br />dangerous. <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to Adopt <br />Resolution 408-09-190 adopting Findings of Fact 40831 relating to the applicant's <br />request for a conditional use permit for a private dog kennel for five dogs at 7960 - 171St <br />Lane NW and adopt Resolution #08-09-191 granting approval of the Conditional Use <br />Permit based on the Findings of Fact # 0831 and declaring terms of the same. <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Olson stated that she feels that Councilmember <br />Dehen does bring up a good point because the ordinance says three dogs are allowed <br />which is why Ms. Randall is here. She noted that it stated in the packet that she has one <br />dog that is elderly. Ms. Randall stated that two of them are over eleven years old.. <br />Councilmember Olson proposed that the CUP permit be for the five dogs that Ms. <br />Randall currently has, and as they "pass" that they not be replaced. Ms. Randall stated <br />that she was told that wasn't what the CUP was for and that once she had it she had it for <br />life. City Attorney Goodrich stated that the Council can put additional stipulations, if it <br />chose, that when a dog expires, the limit is then three. Councilmember Dehen stated that <br />would be akin to an interim use permit until the dogs die. Mayor Gamec stated that the <br />CUP is based on controlling these dogs and if the rules are not abided by, then there will <br />be a problem. He stated that he feels this is for a lifetime providing she maintains the <br />rules that the City sets. Councilmember Look asked what would happen if all five dogs <br />die and she replaces them with five black labs. Mayor Gamec stated that if she can keep <br />them under control, then he feels that is fine. Ms. Randall stated that she feels she has <br />proven that she will follow the rules because she has followed the recommendations by <br />the Planning Commission. Mayor Gamec -stated that most people don't come forward <br />and try to follow the rules, so he would like to support people that do it in the right way <br />like Ms. Randall. Ms. Randall stated that all dogs are spayed and neutered and are <br />current with their vaccinations. City Attorney Goodrich stated that he feels it would be <br />appropriate to include a condition to limit the size of the dogs. Ms. Randall stated that <br />she wouldn't have a problem with that. Councilmember Strommen stated that <br />Condition #5 says no dog under ownership shall be allowed to run at large, and at all <br />times the dogs shall be physically controlled by either a permanent or temporary <br />confinement area or on a leash. She stated that this says nothing about the breed or the <br />size. She stated that she understands there may be some issue with larger breed dogs, <br />but the CUP states that the dogs must be physically controlled. Councilmember Look <br />noted that he understands the intent is to physically control dogs, but people put in <br />invisible fences and the dogs still sometimes get out and become a risk, which is where <br />he has concerns. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec and Councilmembers Elvig, Strommen, and <br />Jeffrey. Voting No: Councilmembers Dehen, Look, and Olson. <br />City Council / September 23, 2008 <br />Page 16 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.