Laserfiche WebLink
CASE #3: BMA PROPERTY REVENUE PROJECTION STUDY <br /> <br /> TIF Specialist, Sean Sullivan prepared a study comparing the Industrial vs. <br /> development of the BMA prope~. EDA members received copies of ~e <br /> Discussion ensued regarding ~e results ~d what it me~ for the CiW. <br /> could alt~ ~e results ~e; Grant money for Sma~ Gro~ could bring im~Ht:i0ns <br /> dollars, TIF roles chan~n.~ and re~angement of taxes. 4~:~?~?'~: <br /> <br />EDA members will review ~e ~alysis. No action required at t~::~e <br /> <br />Motion by ~. Riley and seconded by ~. LeToume~'{'~ adjoum'~.~re~l~ Economic <br /> <br />Motmn camed. Votm g Yes'. Chm~ erson Wa~ er, Mr . ~I-"~;.:' '?~::~eToumea:.:e. ~.Ms . <br />~derson ~d ~. Zi~e~. Voting No: None. Absent:~'MS~'~lah~ ~d Ms. <br />Scheiber. '~%}~.. <br /> <br />~e meeting was adjourned at 8:2~}¢.~":, ..... <br />Respect~lly submitted, .~.:~:3'. ?~::' ':'~(~;~:::; '<:'~:'~;~:~¢;:~:.~ <br /> <br /> ,:.,.. ':~ <br /> <br /> ,.2;'~ <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/September 7, 2000 <br /> Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />-9- <br /> <br /> <br />