My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 10/24/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:48:10 PM
Creation date
7/28/2003 2:38:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/24/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
283
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Consensus of the Commission was that the setback requirements would be applicable <br /> homes on adjacent properties; the distance bet-ween the tower and the home on the, s~te is <br /> decision of the property, owner leasing space to the tower company. ~:~i.f~': <br /> The Commission'discussed at len~h the heiaht of a tower and what height wodi'd:' ~;~C;~odate <br /> <br /> Consensus of the Commission was to stay with the 120 foot height a~:~pyeviod~tz~?mmended~:"(~iT}(4~:;~ <br /> <br /> Commissioner Wivoda stated that section 9.15.17 addresses p ga 4 6r ~a;eur ante~as less than <br /> 50 feet, but a ~ical height is 50 feet. He suggested ch~;{he to b~ a~ng less <br /> <br /> Consensus of the Co~ission w~ to change ~e wo~d~'~6~Section 9.1,5~:'I~7:'~6 read "less ~an 60 <br /> <br /> Motion by Co~issioner Wivoda, seconded by Co~ssion~ K6:dscak, to reco~end that <br /> Ci, Council ~end the tower regulations as proposed. '"~.~ :~ <br /> Motion Ca, ed. Voting Yes: Vid~-~*bhri~'~k~[~Kociscak, Co~issione~::7~ivoda, Dempsey, <br /> Gd~s, ~d Reeve. Vot~g ~o:j)~O~' <br /> Case g7: Request for Site Plan R~w of ~b~*~hte M'2:~6~ Unlisted hc.; .Case of <br /> <br /> Co~u~, De~¢~X~istant Wald st'~{~'_ that in March of 1998, the applicant applied for <br /> a conditmn~'e::be~it to'~bhsh a wareh~Uk~g;~9~h, in a B-1 Business disMct. ~e CiW <br /> Council ~pPm~ed the condf~9~nal use pe~it ~0~'~nt upon site' plan approval. ~e Ci, of <br /> Ramsey h~:received a reRu~k'f' for site pl~ re~'~'~om Concrete Maso~ U~ited, ~c. <br /> site Pi~':~S P~posing. to c~'~c[:a 6,642 sq~ foot o~ce ~d warehouse facili,. ~e area <br /> generally ~d Boile~akers on 153~ Avenue. ~e site is <br /> zoned B-1 Bmi~{'~:'~ce facilities ~e a pe~itted use. W~ehouSing facilities ~e not a <br /> .?~7~j~i~e~ use in a -Bsf~:)Busines{" di's~ct. ~e applic~t properly applied for a condition~ use <br />?~?)-;~-~t':~¢: Ci, Coun~'~g~t-~ approval to the w~ehouse portion of ~e operation. ~e <br /> proposed-b~ding includ~}~ 9,ffice area of 1,362 squ~e feet and a 5,280 square foot w~ehouse <br /> area. ~e st~re mee~g?et~'ack requirements and is in compliance with the 35% lot coverage <br /> restriction. T~;~ite plan"P~;posed to have one access point ~om 153~ Avenue. ~e exterior of <br /> ~e building is ~fOposed to consist of concrete maso~ block, some mainten~ce flee siding ad <br /> ~ asphalt s~n~I~ roo5 ~e proposed siding deviates from ~e Business arcNtecmrat st~dards <br /> ,and will nee4:~i~ Council approval. %e applicant has stated to staff ~at he intends to construct <br /> ':~:~:building: ~f'contains only concrete maso~ units instead of concrete ~d vinyl siding. Staff <br /> ~ec6mmmd:dd that the concrete block be rate,ally treated with color instead of painted concrete. <br /> A reused exterior elevation plan will need to be submiaed to staff prior to CiW Council <br /> apPkogal. ~e applicant is requesting that the back portion of the parcel remain in its natural <br /> <br />-174- <br /> <br />Planning Commission/October 3, 2000 <br /> Page 13 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.