My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 06/13/2000
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2000
>
Agenda - Council - 06/13/2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2025 1:44:10 PM
Creation date
7/28/2003 2:53:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
06/13/2000
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
326
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
presented to the existing residents that included public streets, but the residents were highly <br />opposed to that plan. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik noted that Public Works and City Engineer prefer the <br />private drive because of the higher density. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly inquired if it would be possible to construct a one-way public street. <br /> <br />Mr. Bulow reviewed four street layout alternatives that included the construction of a one-way <br />street. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly questioned how much traffic stacking room would be available. <br /> <br />Mr. Bulow replied that there would be adequate stacking room for 16 cars, which the traffic <br />engineer fi.om Hakanson Anderson felt was extremely adequate for the area. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec questioned how many units will be in each apartment building. <br /> <br />Mr. Bulow replied that there would be 70 to 80 units in each building, which would make the <br />overall density for the entire site less than 15 units per acre. <br /> <br />Councilmember Connolly stated that she would like further information on one-ways and the <br />impact it would have. <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council was to add the issue to the next Council work session. <br /> <br />#2: Proposed Housing Project (Water Tower Site) <br /> <br />The developer requested that their item be tabled. <br /> <br />//3: ACCAP Project <br /> <br />Jeff Johnson, ACCAP, stated that he wanted to keep the Council aware of what has been <br />happening regarding communications with the neighborhood. He explained that ACCAP has <br />held three neighborhood meetings with the attendance of the residents falling to two at the last <br />meeting. He explained that ACCAP is moving into the final step and putting development plans <br />together which will first be presented to the neighbors. The plan is to present the development <br />plans to the neighborhood and get their written approval before it is presented to the Council. <br />Mr. Johnson explained that the site plan has been reduced by 28 units at the request of the <br />neighborhood and they will not be constructing any units on the west side of Sunwood Drive. <br />Mr. Johnson presented the Council with a copy of minutes that a resident had taken during the <br />neighborhood meetings. <br /> <br />City Council/March 28, 1999 <br /> Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br /> -54- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.