My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/28/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2008
>
Agenda - Council - 10/28/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:37:00 AM
Creation date
10/24/2008 2:10:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/28/2008
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
275
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />c.....t <br /> <br />"CASE # - '1 <br />INTRODUCE ORDINANCE TO AMEND PERFORAMNCE STANDARDS <br />IN THE E-l ANDE-2 EMPLOYMENT DISTRICTS; <br />CASE OF CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Sylvia Frolik, Asst. Community Development Director <br />Tim Gladhill, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />For more than 2 decades, City Code has required that outdoor storage, sales, service, display and <br />rental areas are required to be surfaced with bituminous or concrete. Prior to the early 1990's, <br />the City Code required that these areas be "surfaced to control dust". _ Over the years, City Staff <br />has attempted to replace all references to -'surfaced to control dust' with 'surfaced with <br />bituminous or concrete' . <br /> <br />- Observations: <br /> <br />Recently, it came to City Staff's attention that the E-l Employment District regulations still <br />contain a couple otreferences to 'surfaced to control dust' foroutdoor storage areas, 'even though <br />the requirement for bituminous and concrete was adopted in-1993. In addition, both the E-l and <br />E-2 Employment- District regulations do not specify the requirement for curbing around the <br />perimeter of all paved surfaces. As a housekeeping item, CitY Staff is proposing an ordinance <br />amendment to bring consistency and clarification to the performance standards in the <br />employment districts. <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />In accordance with State Statute and City Code, the public hearing notice for the proposed <br />ordinance was adve~ised in the City's official newspaper. <br /> <br />Attachments: ' <br /> <br />1. Edited version of Section 9.20.24 (B-1 Employment District) <br />2. Edited version of Section 9.20.23 (B-2 Employment District) <br />3. Proposed ordinance <br /> <br />Funding: <br /> <br />The processing of this ordinance amendment is considered part of City Staffs'regular duties. <br /> <br />Recommendation: <br /> <br />The Planning Commission met on October 2, - 2008" to hold a Public Hearing and recommended <br />approval of the ordinance: <br /> <br />-17- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.