My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/06/2008
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2008
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/06/2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:46:01 AM
Creation date
10/31/2008 3:31:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/06/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
154
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. _.'''-''-;''~_' n~-._._=",",-O-~ ~--,"----,-~----~--------------'_. .~- ---.- <br />, ' <br /> <br />90 <br /> <br />Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />The court also rejected Martin's argument that the grading fit un~ <br />der an emergency exception of the Fish and Game Code. The court <br />found the damage to the spillway was not an emergericy given that: <br />Martin took seven months to make the repairs; the primary residence <br />on the property was accessible; and the mobile home was a' second- <br />ary residence that had an alternate access,. <br />The court also concluded that the county's Grading Ordir).ance was <br />not rendered inapplicable by the FEMA grant. The court said this <br />was because FEMA regulations acknowledged there may be require- <br />ments for local permits. <br />Finally, the court also rejected Martin's arguments that his grading <br />work did not require a permit because it fit within exceptions under <br />the Grading Ordinance. The court found the spillway was not an ex- <br />isting road and thus not excepted from the Grading Ordinance. The <br />court'also found that Martin was engaged in "fill" not "excavation," <br />and thus his work did not fit within the grading exception for exca- <br />vations involving 50 cubic yards or less of material. <br /> <br />See also: Citizens to Enforce CEQA v. City of Rohnert Park, 131 <br />Cal. App. 4th 1594, 33 Cal. Rptr. 3d 208 (1st Dist. 2005). ' <br /> <br />Nonconforming Use-ZBA allows retail sale <br />of food on residentially zoned property as <br />preexisting, legal nonconforming use <br /> <br />Neighbor argues ZBA erred because any preexisting food <br />sales occurred on adjacent parcel with same ownership <br /> <br />Citation: Parslow V,, Zoning Bd. of Appe~ls of Town of Middletown, <br />110 Conn. App. 349, 954 A.2d'275 (2008) , <br /> <br />CONNECTICUT (09/16/08)-Seventeen Oaks, LLC owned two <br />adjac~nt parcels located at 1277 Randolph Road (Lot 2) and 980 <br />South Main Street (Lot 3) in the town. Both lots were zoned for resi- <br />dential use. Lot 3 had a commercial garage that was a valid noncon- . <br />forming use. <br />In 2004, after Seventeen Oaks erected a permanent food vending <br />stand called Miss Patsy's Kitchen on Lot 2, the town's zoning officer <br />issued a cease and desist order against Seventeen Oaks. The zoning <br />officer issued the order because food vending was not permitted in a <br />residential zone. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />@ 2008 Thomson Reuters/West <br /> <br />~\ <br />) <br /> <br />(= <br /> <br />( )1 <br />',----,,' <br /> <br />i <br />I. <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />1 <br />I <br />! <br />I' <br />1 <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />j <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />1 <br />I <br />I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.