Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chair Elvig asked how this has worked out for Mr. Peterson. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Himmel' admitted that it hasn't worked out too well for Mr. Peterson. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that if there is a project that goes in far away from where there is a <br />sewer connection and there is a desire to have it connected, this area has to fill up to make it cost <br />effective. He stated that he is nervous about using taxpayer dollars for this with the current <br />budget crunch. <br /> <br />Chair Elvig stated that this would come from storm sewer funds, not the General Fund. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that initially when the proposal came in he showed service to <br />his lot and the lot to the west through his property and the City said you can service that sight but <br />the City wants to service lot 7 in the street so the City can have access to both sides of the street. <br />He stated that when lot 7 is developed then they will take a look at sewer and water. <br /> <br />Mr. Young stated that it is not a hardship for him if this is postponed. He noted that next year <br />there is a huge proj ect to redo Armstrong and he felt it may be cheaper to dovetail this into the <br />Armstrong project. He stated that having City services in the street makes the property there <br />more marketable and buildable. <br /> <br />Chair Elvig stated that he doesn't think it precludes the City from providing sewer and water <br />services. He stated that Mr. Young makes a good point about Armstrong and asked if something <br />could be done. <br /> <br />Assistant City Engineer Himmel' stated that sewer stops just south of 10 but it will be continued <br />down to the intersection during the Armstrong project. He stated that the water is already to Mr. <br />Y olmg' s area. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that the question is whether the City extends the sewer and <br />water further to the west at the time it is dug up, if Armstrong Boulevard moves forward. <br /> <br />No action taken. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Consider Acquisition of Tax Forfeit Properties <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that City has received notice that 3 parcels in the City are in the <br />process of going to tax forfeiture and the City can request that they be withheld from public sale <br />so they can be acquired for public purposes. He stated that the first parcels are Outlots A and B <br />at the Ponds of Ramsey 2nd Addition. He stated that staff recommends that this be acquired for <br />drainage, utility and open space purposes.. He stated that the third parcel is Outlot C Wildlife <br />Sanctuary 3rd Addition and noted that staff also recommends acquiring this for drainage and <br />utility purposes as well as open space. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if there is any way of knowing the price on these before the <br />Council commits to that direction. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / October 21, 2008 <br />Page 6 of 11 <br />