Laserfiche WebLink
-332— <br />Perhaps I underestimate what might be properly needed, a single point of language <br />alteration, but the following are either weak and uncertain points needing bolstering; or <br />inappropriate (superseded) language which has been retained but should be changed; <br />page IV -1. It seems that the major concerns of water availability and existing <br />neighborhood character preservation without forced hookups, might be accommodated by <br />Metropolitan Council and neighboring city agreement with simple changes of exactly the <br />sort suggested below [edited perhaps, as needed to be terse, but without losing single - <br />family homeowner protection]: <br />1. Due to its location at the edge of the region, the automobile will continue to be the <br />primary means of taransit for Ramsey residents, and growth will be incremental <br />where a contiguous MUSA line approach has proven infeasible due to intervening <br />existing housing on well and septic systems where lot size and system upkeep <br />make that an attractive ongoing preservation option attentive to the character of <br />existing and established neighborhoods. This is consistent with Met. Council <br />policy stated at a citizen meeting in Ramsey that target goals in progressing to <br />2030 are with regard to total housing units and not with regard to any demands, <br />planned quotas, or requirements of existing homes being made to connect to <br />available municipal sewer and water services. <br />2. [unchanged] <br />3. [first sentence unchanged] Ultimately, such areas may never require public sewer <br />or water services, while water availability given drought and aquifer capacity <br />concerns are a worry of Ramsey, neighboring communities relying on identical <br />water resources, and the Metropolitan Council, which currently is exploring water <br />modeling reliability, for surface and deep ground water sources. <br />4. [unchanged] <br />5. [...] all of the new urban development possible in Ramsey. <br />6. The Metropolitan Council and neighboring communities are informed expansion <br />of rural residential development, consistent with prior Comprehensive Planning, <br />at urban densities of three units per buildable acre are now being n arge planned as part <br />of accommodating new lower density urban growt h densities <br />tracts adjacent to or neighboring Highway 5, with other rural areas remaining at <br />lower densities such as one home per 2 -1/2 acre, subject as always, to amendment <br />proposals suggesting differing urban density is feasible and attention to green <br />space and wetland buffer preservation is suitable. The recent history of non- <br />contiguous MUSA expansion in Ramsey might need a continuation to meet future <br />housing target totals and proposed mapping suggests this. A strict moving MUSA <br />line approach has as a practical matter been abandoned, so that orderly expansion <br />in larger open northern tracts was allowed which bypassed existing single family <br />home neighborhoods not generally desiring forced municipal sewer and water <br />