Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Community Development Director Miller stated that the City could get the money back, <br />however, there are some situations where a builder owns a predominant portion of the property <br />and they are exempt from paying these fees, so if they go bankrupt, the property does not get <br />taken care of. She stated that in other communities where she has worked, association <br />documents were reviewed by the City before the development was approved so the City could <br />see the long term maintenance capabilities and requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gamec stated that on National Night Out, he had conversations with people <br />concerned that their maintenance fees being higher, such as $300/month because of more units <br />being empty. He stated that people were concerned about others moving closer to the cities <br />because of gas prices and what that would do to their maintenance fees. He reiterated that he <br />thinks there will be a bigger problem with vacant single family homes, not vacant townhomes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Elvig stated that he thinks another problem will be that homes valued at $650,000 <br />are being sold for $300,000 because of the current financial dynamics. <br /> <br />Commissioner Look stated that he has been sitting back listening to the conversation and <br />questions how it is the City's responsibility for developer's businesses going south. He stated <br />that he sees someone in Ramsey struggling to make ends meeting and being taxed on top of that <br />with a levy so the City can offset some mistakes made by a developer in a townhome project. He <br />stated that the Council discussed the budget at a recent work session and needed to meet a <br />$250,000 shortfall and looked at cutting a portion of the EDA budget. He stated that he isn't <br />sure that the EDA should take 100% of the hit and suggested that there could be a compromise <br />between the two entities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Elvig asked what the proposed amount of the cut to EDA was, as he was not at <br />the meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson Olson stated that the difference between EDA and HRA is that there is a fund <br />balance in the EDA account of close to $1,000,000. <br /> <br />Commissioner Look asked whether the County had recently come for some of the funds from <br />HRA. <br /> <br />Executive Director Frolik stated that was a separate levy through the County. <br /> <br />Commissioner Look asked what the fund balance was for the HRA. <br /> <br />Executive Director Frolik stated that at year end it should be close to $400,000. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gamec stated that he would like to stay with the recommended amount and keep <br />the levy the same as last year. <br /> <br />Executive Director Frolik stated that the biggest line item in the budget is 6315, which sets aside <br />funding for the City to have a home buyer or rehabilitation program. <br /> <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority / August 26, 2008 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />