Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson introduced the following resolution and niovedfor its adoptiqn: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #08-12-241 <br /> <br />','RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2008, PAYABLE 2009; ~ICIPAL TAX LEvY <br /> <br />NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />RAMSEY, COUNTY OF ANOKA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />, 1) That the followiJ?,g levies for assessed 2008, payable' 2009 ,be levied upon 'the taxable <br />property in said City of Ramsey, Allbka County, State ~f Minneso~ for the following <br />p~cises: <br /> <br />GENERAL LEVY, <br />Fund, 101: General: FUnd ~ General Qperations <br />Fiscal Disparity TrahSfer (as certified)' <br />Collected as PropertY Tax - EDA Levy <br />Collected as Property Tax - General Levy <br /> <br />$ 894;172" <br />291,705 <br />,7.197.862, <br /> <br />$ 8,383,739 <br /> <br />'DEBT SERVICE LEVY ' <br />,CIP Bond <br />Certificates of Indebtedness' <br />Lease Revenue Bonds <br /> <br />152,024 <br />$ 490,613 <br />449.362 <br /> <br />$1,091,999 <br /> <br />DRAINAGE DISTRICT LEVY <br />Mississippi River Storm Water Sub prainage <br />, District,#1 <br /> <br />$43,348 <br />$ 9.519.086 <br /> <br />TOTAL CERTIFIED LEVIES <br /> <br />, 2) That this final levy does -not exceed the Proposed Levy adopted September 8, 2008. <br /> <br />3) That the City Will not be levying the $354,598.13 related to the $4,225,000 GO Impr' <br />Bop.d; Per JP A Agreem~nt with Anoka County, Anoka County is required to pay ,this <br />directly to City. The City will be reducing the levy amount relating to the $19,200,000 <br />'Public Project Lease Revenue bond to $449,362 to reflect an internal funding transfer. <br /> <br />4) ,That the City Administrator/Clerk be. directed to transmit a certified copy of this <br />resolution to the Anoka 'County Auditor's office on or before Monday, December 29, <br />2008. <br /> <br />That the' motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by <br />. Councilmember Strommen and upon vote bemg taken thereon, the following voted in favor: - <br /> <br />-9- <br />