My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/20/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 01/20/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 9:32:08 AM
Creation date
1/15/2009 2:31:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
01/20/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />COI\IlVllTTEE BUSINESS <br /> <br />Cnsc# 1; <br /> <br />Consider Parking Restrictions on St. Francis Boulevard Fronhlgc RQad <br /> <br />City Engineel' Jankowski stated that the City received a letter from one of the six property <br />owners on the frontage renld that runs along St. Frunds Boulcvrlrd.Fk noted that the lettcr stated <br />that, at times, when there was parking on both sides, it becon'lcs very nnrrow and becomcs <br />ditl1cul t for ~l vehlele to pass. lIe statt:d that staff checked the roud and foui'ld it was only 20 feet <br />wide, which is very narrow and they have concerns with the ability to get emergency vehicles in, <br />as well as regular traftic to squeeze thl"Ough. He stated that the police department has indicated <br />that they have not seen a lot of problems. He stated that, however, if there were a tire, it could <br />be fought from TH 47, but it would not be desirable. He stated that he had contacted all 6 of the <br />property owners letting them know that this was on the agenda. He stated that he received a <br />phone call ti'om one of the residents who said, essentially, that they would like to see the <br />situation remain as it is. He stated that staff is recommending resti:icting the parking on one side, <br />but have a discussion with property ownerS first. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Dehcn ~lskcd \.vhat would be the disudvantage to restricting the parking. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jank()wski stuted th~lt the arguments are that it i::; very rare when it happens, so <br />residents dicln' t see a public safety problem. <br /> <br />At Kernpf, 15220 St. Francis Boulevard, stated thut he is the one who sent the letter to the City. <br />He stated that with the road improvelnent project nearby, tc) bring a road through to the school, <br />he expucts there to be additional traffic. on the front~lge road. He stated that once the <br />improvement is done and the more traffic is traveling on a very mtrfow street, it would be tight. <br />He stated that he generated the letter because of concerns about the future generation of tramc. <br /> <br />Randy Touric, 15120 St. FrtU1cis Boukvard, stated that he is totally in favor of just restricting the <br />parking to one side and noted that he was afraid that the parking would be totally restricted. <br /> <br />, Vice Chair Dehen asked if there has been any opposition from the residents. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that he has not beard from any others. <br /> <br />Mayor Gurnee stated that there is not a lot Cl f traft1c in the area, and he doesn't think the frontage <br />road will get a lot of the new traffic v,iith the new access to the school. He stated that the rOtld is <br />really narrow and he would think fot' safet)' t'f.:)tlsons that the parking should be restricted to the <br />residenti~ll side of the street. <br /> <br />COI.mcilmember Olson stated thnt she agrees, even though it is a rare occasion when p('lrldng <br />occurs em both sides, if an emergency ve;;:hicle had to get down then~, it wouldn't make a <br />difference how rare it is and feels restricting parking is u reasonable option. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee / November 18,2008 <br />!luge 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.