My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1995 Working Papers
>
Comprehensive Plan
>
Comprehensive Plan (old)
>
1990-1999
>
1995 (Approved)
>
1995 Working Papers
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2009 10:15:11 AM
Creation date
1/16/2009 10:13:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Miscellaneous
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Date: <br /> <br />May 19, 1995 <br /> <br />To: <br /> <br />Bill Goodrich, Ramsey City Attorney <br /> <br />From: <br /> <br />David Bawden, Planning and Zoning Chairperson <br /> <br />Subject: <br /> <br />Comprehensive Plan Update <br /> <br />This is in response to the memo that I received from Ryan Schroeder regarding <br />the controversy over the comprehensive plan update. Attached you will find a copy of the <br />memo that I sent to the various concerned individuals within the city government. <br />The bottom line of my concern is the apparent agenda of Jim Gromberg to have <br />the Economic Development Commission come up with their own plan instead of <br />addressing the simple task of land use in the Highway 10 area. This authority may have <br />been given to him by others (possibly senior staff or other elected officials) that may not <br />have been happy with the plan that the Planning Commission was coming up with <br />because he seemed to be pursuing this agenda without fear of repercussions. If there <br />were objections to the plan then the procedure is to have a public hearing and City <br />Council approval before the plan was adopted. During this process anyone could have <br />raised objections so that City Council could hear "the other side of the story". This <br />process also could have taken place in late 1994 instead of involving consultant time and <br />unnecessary extra cost to the city. <br />I don't know of any conduct by anyone that may have legal concerns but certainly <br />questionable ethics plays a major role in what has occurred. <br />I have also enclosed a copy of the city code that pretty clearly states the <br />responsibilities of the Planning Commission and the Economic Development Commission. <br />I am sure you are aware of this but I am including it to further support my position with <br />regard to what the Planning Commission was trying to accomplish. <br />If you have any questions please feel free to give me a call (H) 753-4055, (W) 753- <br /> <br />5923. <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />Memo 4/20/95 <br />Memo 5/11/95 <br />Boards and Commissions <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.