My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 01/13/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2009
>
Minutes - Council - 01/13/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 1:54:28 PM
Creation date
1/30/2009 2:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/13/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Olson replied on a day-to-day basis - no. However, he felt that people would park <br />there even if we could go with a narrower street and no parking on either side or one-side. <br />He gave the standard widths for each scenario. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen inquired if this is a 38-foot road to which Mr. Olson replied 32 <br />feet. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated we would restrict parking on the one side. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen asked would parking be on a designated side. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski stated that it would be signed and striped. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson added that is a standard, <br /> <br />" <br />'. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated that the decision of with sidewalks or without sidewalks has <br />to be made. <br /> <br />Mr. Jankowski replied yes, but after the project is ordered. <br /> <br />Mr. Olson stated he realizes it is difficult for Council to make the decision without <br />knowing the costs, but staff would like some direction. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated he does not know if it is advantageous to say we want to <br />build the street and later put in a sidewalk. He felt that the decision boils down to if the <br />City Council wants a sidewalk or not and noted the goal of walkability where possible. <br />He did not know if going back after the fact would solve anything. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated that he agrees with Councilmember Look. He stated he <br />(Jeffrey) is all about public safety and getting children offthe street. He felt if it were not <br />done now, we would be coming back at a later date and saying we need sidewalks. He <br />suggested this is an opportunity to put in the sidewalk and he felt the City ought to do it. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Olson expressed gratitude to the neighborhood first of all as <br />this discussion is a result of many of their discussions. He inquired of Council if there is <br />a consensus to favor the sidewalk. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated the Council could direct the feasibility study to be <br />modified to say a sidewalk will or will not be included. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he is still "flip-flopping". He wondered why there could <br />not be two feasibility studies - one with a sidewalk and one without, and find out which <br />one the residents counter-petition against. <br /> <br />City Council/January 13, 2009 <br />Page 8 of31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.