My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:48:53 PM
Creation date
2/5/2009 12:38:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/10/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that he had also invited people to e-mail and call if they couldn't <br />be here tonight and he distributed those comments to the Committee. He stated that this project <br />could not be done without the cooper~tion of Mallard Ponds Townhomes. He stated that he has <br />heard concerns about people walking on narrow streets and perhaps the City could put speed <br />humps on the streets, which can be done, even on private streets. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that staff was directed to contact Mallard Ponds and see if <br />they would be interested because there really wouldn't be any reason for people to use the <br />roadway because it is basically a loop from Dysprosium to Dysprosium. He stated that they met <br />with them and their answer was a resounding no, which is completely within their rights. He <br />stated that he has not seen a lot of support in e-mails or phone conversations to open the gate, <br />He stated that he understands that there are many reasons why the residents wouldn't want the <br />gate to be open. He stated that the City wanted to make sure that they talked to them and <br />informed them of some options. He stated that he doesn't think it is a very viable alternative. <br /> <br />Fire Chief Kapler stated that when this area was developed, it was not an ideal area because there <br />was a busy road on the east and south and also a big wetland that borders Mallard Ponds on the <br />east. He stated that multiple access is always better from a public safety standpoint. He stated <br />that the gate was discussed at that time and then Bunker was improved and Barium Street access <br />was closed, so now there really is only one access. He stated that he respects everybody's <br />opinion, but his responsibility is public safety and from that standpoint only, opening the access <br />would be better. He stated that they are out there all the time for accidents on 142nd. <br /> <br />Darre! Chapman, 14095 Argon Street, stated that it could have been City streets, but the neighbor <br />to the north wouldn't allow it. He stated that they pay full taxes on their houses but maintain and <br />plow their own streets without any help from City, so, if a police car and fire truck has to crash <br />through the gate, he thinks that would cover the money they have already paid in taxes to the <br />City. <br /> <br />Vice Chair Dehen stated that even though the City investigated opening the gate up, it isn't really <br />on the table today. <br /> <br />Public Works Olson stated that it is an option but there are a lot of concerns from people in the <br />audience tonight. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee I November 18,2008 <br />Page 4 of8 <br /> <br />-164- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.