My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 02/10/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:48:53 PM
Creation date
2/5/2009 12:38:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
02/10/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
281
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Pollution Prevention! Good Housekeeping <br /> <br />Street Sweeping, annual inspection of 20% of <br />ponds and outfalls, annual inspection.of 100% of <br />water quality treatment devices, maintenance of <br />ponds and other BMPS <br /> <br />The application materials indicated MS4s draining to impaired waters or restricted discharge <br />waters would have to evaluate how to change their systems; however, specific requirements were <br />not provided. The MPCA has published BMP summary sheets within the last 6 months outlining <br />with details for these two classes of waters. The City of Ramsey drains to the Mississippi River <br />and the Rum River. The Mississippi River from St Cloud to the Anoka City limits is protected <br />from new or expanded stormwater discharges and is considered impaired because of mercury <br />and PCB's found in fish tissue. The Rum River from Onamia to Madison and Rice Streets in <br />Anoka is also protected from new or expanded stormwater discharges and is considered <br />impaired because of mercury in fish tissue. Rogers Lake in the northeast comer of the city is also <br />listed on the impaired waters list. <br /> <br />The MPCA began reviewing our MS4 application in December 2008 and provided comments on <br />the application. Revisions to the existing BMP summary sheets have been submitted for their <br />review. Their comments also required including two new BMP summary sheets, Discharges to <br />Impaired Waters and Discharges to Protected Waters. <br /> <br />Ramsey Impacts: <br /> <br />The MPCA selected 1988 as the year to start evaluating if new or expanded stormwater <br />discharges to the Rum River or Mississippi Rivers were created. The Clean Water Act <br />reauthorization occurred in 1988 so it was chosen as the benchmark year. The MPCA BMP <br />Summary sheet suggests evaluating all discharges that have been created since that date and <br />projecting to the year 2020 for discharges charges from future development. The MPCA is <br />looking at these specific pollutants, increased stormwater volume, Total Suspended Solids (TSS) <br />and Total Phosphorus (TP). The ponds created with developments were designed to reduce the <br />TSS and TP in stormwater leaving the site. The volume reduction must be addressed through <br />use of any or all of the following strategies: infiltration basins, Low Impact Development (LID), <br />rain barrels, zoning or ordinance changes. Staff met with the MPCA regarding the permit for the <br />County Pond Storm Sewer Outfall and also discussed the MS4 permit at the same time. <br /> <br />The Surface Water Management Plan adopted in 2008 requires all future developments to limit <br />the peak rate ofrunoffto 75% of the pre-development rate. The MPCA indicated this is a step in <br />the right direction; however, volume control must also be addressed. Staff has been reviewing <br />volume control strategies adopted by watershed districts in Minnesota and will be bringing <br />options forward at a future meeting for review and discussion. The MPCA has indicated that <br />they will consider a prudent and feasible argument for alternatives to eliminating the discharge if <br />the city takes the following steps: <br />. Incorporate infiltration and other practices in future developments to minimize the impact <br />of new storm water runoff <br />. Incorporate these practices in re-development of existing areas. <br />. Include cost and environmental considerations in analysis of alternates. <br /> <br />-186- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.