Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ii <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />.. <br />n <br />I <br />I <br />'! <br />j: <br />11 <br />i <br />II <br />Ii <br />[I <br /> <br />:1 <br /> <br />:1 <br />Ii <br />11 <br />:1 <br />:\ <br />;1 <br />Ii <br /> <br />!I <br />jl <br />I <br />i <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />'I <br />I <br />:1 <br />'i <br />~l <br /> <br />January-December I Volume 2 I Index 2008 <br /> <br />.--::;.;; <br /> <br />I,' <br />, I <br /> <br />Issue- Page <br /> <br />Takings. See Takings, this index. <br />Vagueness <br />. Ordinance, of (NY), ........................................:..,....Nov. 25 11 <br />Ruling on flag-shaped lotschaUenged as <br />unconstitutionally vague (TX), .....u........................... June 10 9 <br /> <br />CONSTRUCTIVE APPROVAL <br /> <br />Rescission of constructive approval, appeal of (MA), ...Mar. 25 10 <br /> <br />CORNER LOTS <br /> <br />\~ <br /> <br />Right-of-way claimed not to qualify as street (IN), ........Jan. 25 <br /> <br />DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS <br /> <br />Validity of (OR), ..................,.......................,...............Aug.25 . <br /> <br />DRAINAGE <br /> <br />Inadequate consideration of drainage system in <br />approval of building plans, challenge claiming (KY), ....Jan. 10 <br /> <br />DURATION OF RIGHfS <br /> <br />Automatic stay pending appeal argued in <br />. assertion that conditions not met before <br />expiration oEconditional permit (WA), ..~...,.................Aug. 10 <br />Estate of deceased landowner pursues <br />development application he filed (OR), ........................Aug. 10 <br /> <br />EASEMENTS <br /> <br />Equitable waiver from requirements of ordinance <br /> <br />sought (NH), .. ..... .................. ........ .................. ....... ........ Dec. 25 <br /> <br />Subdivision, denial of special permit to build; <br />argument of illegal extinguishrrient of easement (MA), Nov. 25 <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Criteria for determining need for environmental <br /> <br />review' (NC), .................................. ...................... ....... ... Jan. 10 <br /> <br />ESTOPPEL <br /> <br />Denial of plat similar to those approved years <br />before contrary to zoning regulations (KY), .................Nov. 10 <br /> <br />FAILURE TO ACT <br /> <br />Deemed approval argued upon failure to act (PA), ....... June 25 <br /> <br />. FENCES <br /> <br />Variance sought for fence and parking lot (NY), ...........Apr.25 <br /> <br />Zoning Bulletin @ 2009 Thomson Reuters <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />I <br />/ <br />~:.:.-'" <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />55 <br />