Laserfiche WebLink
<br />January-December I Volume 211ndex 2008 <br /> <br />Issue Page <br /> <br />Performance bond after subdivision expiration, <br />mortgage interest holders demand town call (CT), .......May 25 5 <br />Road improvements, assessment for one-third <br />cost of (NH), ................................................................. June 10 7 <br />Sewer service, developer argues he should have <br />received conditional approval of subdivision plan <br />where lack of (PA), .......................................................Aug. 10 10 <br />Special use permit requirement for subdivision of <br />property into more than thirty lots, challenge <br /> <br />to (CT), .:.. .......... ............. ........ ..................... ................. Oct. 25 6 <br /> <br />Subjective requirements, denial of proposal based <br /> <br />on (NC), ....... ..... .......... ......................................... .........Apr. 10 10 <br /> <br />Time period, denial of preliminary plat approval <br />not within statutory (MN), ....:.....................................Nov. 10 4 <br />Variance. denial for subdivision claimed to. be <br />arbitrary and capricious (NY), ..................................... May 10 11 <br /> <br />TAKINGS <br /> <br />. Airport transition zone height restrictions as <br />taking without compensation, claim that (NY), ............Feb. 10 5 <br />Denial of request for rezoning and variance <br />alleged t be taking of property and violations Of <br />due process and equal protection (6th Circ.), ............... May 10 5 <br />Planned unit development modification, <br />constitutional challenge to (DC), ...................................Sep. 25 10 <br />Undersized lot, argument of unconstitutional <br />taking in denial of variance to construct dwelling <br />on (CT), ............. .-;;......... ............. .....:.......... ........ ........... July 25 4 <br /> <br />TAX CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Conditional development "tax, fee or charge" on <br />development, state law prohibiting (WA), ...........~......... Sep. 10 5 <br /> <br />i <br />\\ <br /> <br />TIMING CONSIDERATIONS <br /> <br />Appeal of zoning permit, untimely (NH), .......................Oct. 10 8 <br /> <br />Automatic stay pending appeal argued in <br />assertion that conditions not met before <br />expiration of conditional permit (WA), ........................Aug. 10 7 <br /> <br />Delay in approval of permit application, due <br />process challenge where (9th Circ.), ..............................July 10 10 <br /> <br />Zoning Bulletin @2009 Thomson Reuters <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />63 <br />