Agenda - Council - 03/10/2009 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

APPENDIX B Street Maintenance Program Assessment Practices .1. Projects are identified by individual subdivision, or by grouping of subdivision and tots having similar pavement histories and conditions and similar pavement areas per benefited unit. 2. An assessment share will be calculated by determining the total assessable cost of the project and dividing by the number of benefited units. 3, Where an individual lot has more than one frontage and not all frontages s are schedule considered to receive an improvement or the same type of improvements, th e benefited and be assessed a full share for the improvement which is conducted along the frontage of the lot that contains the main driveway opening. 4 For overlays the amount assessed to benefited property owner is 50% of the total project; cost including overhead costs. (1991), 5. Fo ject r walcoats the assessment to bene t"ited property owner shall be 4311/iicedt of b t ot al pr each cost inducting overhead costs in program year 2008, and shall be successive: year until reduced to an 8% assessment in program y ear 2013. after the 2013 program there shall be no assessment for sealcoats. (2007). ojects 6. Projects .involving streets which have had previous prop ontribution�nf the project requ requires a b petition shall be ineligible to receive the City s 5U /o more expensive maintenance. (i.e.. streets proposed for sealcoating prof ct which was defeated by citizen petition now are proposed for a bituminous overlay) ( ) 7. Where the rule of dividing the assessable project cost out by the number qb nefit ns (n 2 a would result in an asse;ssabl.e share 1 receiving which to �' e the City improv assessable share being charged to ll th r e averageassessable share being made t lots Council may elect to assess such lo ts receiving similar improvements for that protect year. (1996) 8. Where. a a benetitcd area contains commercial lots . having widely varying sizes, the assessment shall be made based on area of the lot, (2003) on a state 9. Where an individual lot has more than one frontage including; a driveway e frontage assessment or county road, and a non - driveway frontage on a NISA or city street, share will be made for an improvement to the MSA or City street (199 5)