My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Charter Commission - 10/17/1991
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Charter Commission
>
1991
>
Minutes - Charter Commission - 10/17/1991
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 1:33:02 PM
Creation date
7/31/2003 11:12:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Charter Commission
Document Date
10/17/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #2: Further Discuss Chapter 8 <br /> <br />The Commissioners offered suggestions for change to Chapter 8 of the City Code. Section <br />8.05.04 in the first sentence assumes that there is a City newsletter, this may not always be the <br />case. Perhaps a phrase saying something like "if there is one." could be added to the end of the <br />sentence. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that in Section 8.05.06 there is a sixty day waiting period for ordering local <br />improvements, Statute 4.29 only requires a thirty day waiting period and that thirty days should be <br />sufficient to gather any necessary information. <br /> <br />Chairman Steffen inquired as to exactly how the numbers are counted; whether it is according to <br />parcel size or strictly by number of persons. Chairman Steffen also stated that we need a method <br />by which improvements are made rather than just discussed. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder stated that according to Statute a petition can be presented by owners of 35% of the <br />frontage. <br /> <br />Chairman Steffen commented that is how it should be as those persons who have to pay for it have <br />the most say. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder commented that the one year moratorium specified in Section 8.05.13 should be <br />reduced to six months. <br /> <br />Chairman Steffen stated that it could a petition could be presented again after a period of six <br />months by those who may have changed their mind and decided they do want an improvement. <br />That way it is not a case of City Council badgering people into agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Schroeder felt that was agreeable. Mr. Schroeder also mentioned that there was an item the <br />Statute 4.29 that was not in our Charter; that being if a park improvement was proposed, the Park <br />Board must also give their approval. <br /> <br />Chairman Steffen stated that sealcoating is more like regular maintenance rather than an <br />improvement. Chairman Steffen feels that sealcoating should not be put up to a vote, because if it <br />was voted down, the street would waste away and would need replacement in just a few years. <br /> <br />Commissioner Goode also believes that sealcoating is normal and customary maintenance. <br /> <br />Case #3: Schedule Next Charter Commission Meeting <br /> <br />The next Charter Commission meeting will be scheduled fgr Thursday, January 16, 1992. All <br />Commissioners will be sent a copy of Minnesota .Statute .~.4t29.021 - .061 for their review one <br />month prior to the meeting. S¢~4~ C¢0.¢¢" <br /> <br />COMMISSION INPUT <br /> <br />Commissioner Goode asked Mr. Schroeder about how utilities such as cable television are <br />franchised or granted permission to operate in Ramsey. His neighborhood is unable to get cable <br />television services. <br /> <br />Charter Commission / October 17, 1991 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.