Laserfiche WebLink
<br />8) That MnDOT responded with no concerns regarding the request. <br /> <br />9) That the proposed daycare is currently licensed through the MN Department of Human <br />Services. <br /> <br />10) That the proposed conditional :use will/will not result in adverse effects on the public <br />health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. <br /> <br />11) That the proposed use wilVwill not adversely impact traffic in the area. <br /> <br />12) That the proposed use wilVwill not be dangerous or detrimental to persons residing or <br />working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />13) That the proposed use wilVwill not substantially or adversely impair the use, enjoyment <br />or market value of surrounding properties. <br /> <br />14) That the proposed use wilVwill not be operated and maintained so as to be harmonious <br />and appropriate in. appearance with the existing or intended character of the general <br />vicinity and such use wilVwill not change the essential character of the area. . <br /> <br />15) That the proposed use wilVwill not create additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services. <br /> <br />16) That the proposed use wilVwill not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />17) That the proposed use wilVwill not be disturbing or hazardous to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br /> <br />18) That the proposed use wilVwill. not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and <br />equipment and conditions of operation that may be detrim~ntal to any persons, property <br />or the general welfare, by reason of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke or glare. <br /> <br />19) That the proposed use wilVwill not be in accordance with the objectives of the <br />Comprehensive Plan and the intent of Chapter 9 of the City Code. The proposed use <br />would/would not be in accordance with the Conditional Use Permit ordinance as it is <br />stated. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />and the following voted against the same: <br /> <br />and the following abstained: <br /> <br />and the following were absent: <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />Resolution #09-04- <br />Page 2 of3 <br />