Laserfiche WebLink
<br />fact that Mn/DOT recognizes that there are needs on these two routes will help in obtaining <br />future funding. <br /> <br />. Page 6-15 - Roadway System Plan - Recommended Policies...,..- buUet 2: The second sentence is <br />not very clear. What multiple roadways are being improved? Based on the text, it looks like <br />only CSAH 116 is shown as needing improvements. <br /> <br />. Page 6-16 - top bullet, second sub bullet: Replace telecommunications with telecommuting. <br /> <br />. Page 6-16 - top bUllet: Consider removing the last bullet and instead talk about working with <br />the Anoka County TMO. They are a resource that the city can use and the TMO has helped the <br />citY with efforts on Ramsey Star Express. <br /> <br />. Page 6-16 - #1: The text under this bullet only indicates that the feasibility of incorporating <br />access management into ordinances will be studied. . A requirement of the local planning <br />handbook provided by the Met Council indicates that cities need to incorporate state and county <br />access guidelines into their plans and into their zoning and subdivision ordinances. The county. <br />. would requestthat you do both of these things. If you need a copy ofthe county's guidelines, we <br />will certainly provide a copy for your use. <br /> <br />. Page 6-16 - #4: AddCSAH 116 to the second sentence. The bullets address the CSAH 116 <br />access study as well as 'the TH 10/169 and TH 47 studies. Consider revising bullets on TH <br />10/169 to better reflect the actual work and progress being made on the corridor. A discussion <br />should focus on interchange access, removing traffic signals, conversion to a freeway, acquisition <br />of property, etc. <br /> <br />. Page 6-17 - Jurisdictional and Functional Classifications -1 st paragraph: Anoka County has not <br />proposed transferring a portion of CSAH 5 and CSAlI 56 to the state trunk highway system. <br />Please remove this sentence. Remove the last sentence - the jurisdictional. transfer of TH 47 is . <br />not related to a new Mississippi River crossing. <br /> <br />. Page 6-17 - Jurisdictional and Functional Classifications: The county does have some roadways, <br />that it has identified as jurisdictional transfer candidates. These. routes would go to the City of <br />Ramsey:CR 63 between TH 47 and CSAH 5; CR 27 between TH 47 and the eastern city <br />boundary; and CSAH 5 between TH 47 and CR57. <br /> <br />. Page 6-18 - Measures to Provide Adequate Operations on TH 10 -letter c: Instead of saying. <br />that MnJDOT is an active supporter of pursuing RALF funds for the expansion ofTH 10 - which <br />is not really accurate - RALF funds are used for right of way, not roadway expansion - the text. <br />could say that Mn/DOT supports improvements along this corridor as indicated in its partneririg <br />on design and environmental documents and the needs identified as part ofits STP. <br /> <br />. Page 6-18 - Measures to Provide Adequate Operations on TH 10 - 1st bullet: CSAH 116 is <br />programmed for 2011, not 2012. Thatis a recent change on our end and o~CIP needs to be <br />updated to reflect the change. <br /> <br />. Page 6-22 -Recommended Plan_1st and2Ddparagraphs: TH 10 already has a dedicated transit <br /> <br />85 <br />