Laserfiche WebLink
NPDES Phase II Cost Estimates <br /> Andrew J. Reese, P.E. <br /> Ogden Environmental and Energy Services, Inc. <br /> 3800 Ezell Rd., Suite 100, Nashville, TN, 37211 <br />Introduction <br />The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has published .final <br />rules expanding the existing stormwater NPDES permil~ting program to <br />smaller cities and other urban areas throughout the United States. Due both <br />to external pressures and directives from the current and past <br />administrations, EPA is conscious of attempting to make the current <br />stormwater NPDES program "cost-effective." For example: <br /> "EPA believes this rule will cost significantly less than the existing 1995 rule that is <br /> currently in place, and will result in significant mor~etized financial, recreational and <br /> health benefits, as well as benefits that EPA has been unable to monetize, including <br /> reduced scouring and erosion of streambeds, improved aesthetic quality of waters, <br /> reduced eutrophication of aquatic systems, benefit to wildlife and endangered and <br /> threatened species, tourism benefits, biodiversity benefits and reduced siting costs of <br /> reservoirs." <br />"... the Agency recognizes the continuing imperative to assure that environmental <br />regulations accomplish statutory objectives in the least burdensome and most cost- <br />effective fashion. As explained further in this preamble, the form and substance of <br />NPDES permits to address the sources designated in today's proposal would provide <br />greater flexibility for the newly covered sources than the existing "standard"' NPDES <br />permit." <br />While the "benefit" side of the proposed regulations exists in the realm of <br />gross estimates, the "cost" side is also filled with unknowns. What will the <br />mandated and negotiated stormwater program cost a local community? Are <br />there ways to reduce costs? What should a local community be doing now <br />to prepare for this regulatory program? This paper seeks to address these <br />related questions. <br />The final r'egulations were published on December 8'h, and the changes from <br />the draft regulations are only minor. But it is still not possible to say what <br />the regulations will cost everyone in toto. This is so because: <br /> · there is great flexibility inherent in the regulations to create a <br /> stormwater quality program tailored to meet an individual community's <br /> needs and situation; <br /> · each permit writer has preferences and "hot buttons" that will color <br /> what any particular program will look like; and . <br /> · each community setting is different in terms of climate, topography, <br /> pollutants of concern, and current condition Of local waters. <br />Basic Approach to Permitting <br />Under proposed § 123.35(g), an NPDES permitting authority issues a general <br />permit to authorize stormwater discharges from regulated small municipal <br />separate storm sewer systems, The NPDES permitting authority will also <br />provide a menu of regionally appropriate and field-tested Best Management <br /> <br />29 <br /> <br /> <br />