My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/07/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 08/07/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:31:35 AM
Creation date
8/4/2003 3:28:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
08/07/2003
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
201
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
July 25, 2003 -- Page 7 <br /> <br /> Standing -- Landowners object to swine buildings <br />Special exception awarded to owner <br /> <br />NEBRASIC{ (6/10/03) -- The County Board of Supervisors ~anted permits <br />to Curtis O. Griess & Sons for construction of four building sites to be used for <br />housing several thousand swine. <br /> Resident taxpayers and landowners in Clay County filed a petition chal- <br />lenging the board's issuance of one of the permits, contending the board did <br />not have the power to grant a special exception to the zoning regulations for <br />the proposed operation. <br /> The taxpayers asked the court to declare the permit invalid. On Oct. 5, <br />2001, the court decided the petitioners lacked standing to sue. The case was <br />distressed, and the petitioners appealed. <br /> On appeal, the petitioners argued the court erred in finding they lacked <br />standing. They contended a state law granted them standing and they had proven <br />compliance with the law, which provided: ~'Any taxpayer or taxpayers of the <br />county may institute proceedings to compel specific performance by the proper <br />official or officials of any duty." <br />DECISION: Affirmed. <br /> The taxpayers and land owners lacked standing. <br /> There were five zoning districts in the county, and the application was in- <br />tended for the district that was designated for general agriculture. The petition- <br />ers did not allege they owfied property within ~at general agx-iculture district. <br /> Furthermore, the petitioners did not plead that they had any specific prop- <br />erty interest other than being resident taxpayers and owners of land within the <br />county. Nor did they claim they had a legal or equitable title or right to real <br />estate impacted by these permits, that they would suffer any damages or injury <br />if the construction were to be completed. <br /> The petitioners failed to establish they bad standing to appeal the board's <br />decision. <br />Citation: Griess v. Clay Coun~ Board of Supervisors, Nebraska Court of <br />Appeals, No. A-0]-1207 (2003). <br />see also: Metropolitan Utilities District v. Twin Platter NRD, 550 N. W. 2d 907 <br />(1996). <br /> <br />Adult Entertainment -- Proposal submitted for adult book and video <br />stores with live entertainment <br />Appeal rejected for exceeding 30-day time limit <br /> <br />NEW HAMPSHIRE (6/9/03) -- Route 1'2 Books & Video went to the plan- <br />ning board on May 3, 2000, for a conceptual consultation regarding its pro- <br />posa! to use a building as an adult-oriented book and video store, as well as <br />offering live entertainment. The building was located in an area zoned for com- <br />mercial uses. <br /> <br />107 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.