Laserfiche WebLink
assure that they get it done rather than have to do an extension. If they don't get to the official <br />mapping process in six months what would the recommendation be. <br /> <br />Mr. Tinklenberg replied that he was very confident that they could meet the six months <br />requirement. He explained that there are State law provisions that would allow the moratorium <br />to be extended, but one of the things they worked hard on is building a level of communication <br />with the property owners and that is something they want to continue. The Tinklenberg Group <br />will stick to the six months time frame. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen requested a timeline of what will occur over the next six months. <br /> <br />Mr. Tinklenberg explained that the process will take its first major step on July 24th at which <br />time local officials will meet to discuss the corridor then the preparation of the report will occur <br />which will incorporate other studies. That report will then be available for public comment in <br />September. The recommendations will then come to the Council and then they can start the <br />official mapping process. 'He thought that the City should be well into the process in the fall and <br />be concluded in November or December. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook stated that he had a very difficult time moving forward with the <br />moratorium and if The Tinklenberg Group ends up needing another six months he probably <br />would not vote in favor of it. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he questions why the moratorium is needed from the Anoka border up <br />to Ramsey Boulevard. His feeling is that if they are going to get the North Star Corridor into the <br />area they will not see anything along Highway #10 for many years. The City needs tax base to <br />bring in more money. Some of the people on vacant land may have the opportunity to sell it. If <br />they were to allow the land from Ramsey Boulevard to the east to develop the City would be <br />better off financially. If Highway #10 is redeveloped in 8 to 10 years then it would be g/'eat, but <br />he did not know that that was realistic. He questioned if this was a situation where the City is <br />bailing the State out when the City doesn't receive anything in return. He stated that he was not <br />convinced that by officially mapping the property it would move the project forward. Mayor <br />Gamec inquired if the City were to purchase land under the official mapping process would the <br />City be reimbursed right a way. <br /> <br />Mr. Tinklenberg explained that with RALF funds the City would be able to receive the funds <br />immediately if they are using federal funds then the City would have to wait until the project was <br />to proceed before being reimbursed. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec stated that he did not see anything from the State indicating that they were trying <br />to help the City. He noted that he would not have a problem with placing the moratorium from <br />Ramsey Boulevard to the Elk River border. <br /> <br />Mr. Tinklenberg replied that those are the political issues the Council has to address. The reason <br />the area east of Ramsey Boulevard is included is because that is where the relocation of the <br />roadway would occur. In terms of the policy issues he has not found anyone ready to help them <br /> <br />City Counci//July 8, 2003 <br />Page 11 of 30 <br /> <br />P71 <br /> <br /> <br />