My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:57:30 PM
Creation date
4/9/2009 12:53:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: Sandy & Harry Jensen <br />Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:23 PM <br />To: Jeffrey, David; David Jeffrey <br />Cc: 'colin @colinmcgione.com'; 'mlook @ci.ramsey.mn.us'; 'mayorramsey @ci.ramsey.mn.us'; Amber Miller; <br />Mark Riverblood <br />Subject: Proposed Memorial Park <br />Dear David, <br />As we discussed in our phone conversation in late February, our property abuts Site 1 of the <br />proposed Memorial Park at the intersection of Sunwood Drive and Junkite Street. Because <br />we are currently residing in Arizona and will not be available to attend the upcoming <br />meetings, we are writing now to go on record with our concerns regarding the building of <br />this memorial at Site 1. <br />We feel Site 1 is not a desirable location for a Memorial Park because of safety issues. <br />People coming to visit the park will have to cross a busy street with no crosswalk. Currently <br />Sunwood Drive handles the traffic between Hwy 47 and the shopping center in Downtown <br />Ramsey and all the local traffic that moves through the area from Nowthen Blvd. Although <br />the speed is posted at 35 mph, a good share of the travelers drive faster then the speed <br />limit allows. Building at this location would needlessly put visitors at risk. <br />We also have concerns about the aesthetics of the park. Who will maintain the park in 10 <br />years when all the money that has been set aside has been spent? Is it logical to believe <br />that those who are proposing the park or the child's parents will remain in the vicinity . <br />forever and be faithful to its upkeep? We believe a memorial to the child's life would be <br />more meaningful if the money was used to further safety, or fund a scholarship for a needy <br />'child or another more positive cause. Does it make sense for the city to entertain future tax <br />liabilities? <br />Because our property abuts the property of Site 1, we currently enjoy a certain amount of <br />privacy. We enjoy the swamp on the back side and the open area to the south. We are set <br />back from Sunwood Drive and the activity it brings. We feel that a park at that site would <br />disturb our privacy and possibly bring unwelcome visitors to our property. We would need <br />to be more watchful of the activities surrounding us and the possibility of vandalism. We <br />purchased the property 15 years ago because of the privacy. We were told the vacant land <br />was not buildable and that it was set aside for runoff for the wetland. <br />We certainly understand the desire to do something to remember the little boy whose life <br />was lost. But what about the lady involved in this tragic accident. A park at this location <br />would be for her a constant reminder of the life shattering experience she had She is most <br />certainly doing everything possible to forget the incident yet a park at this location will <br />prevent her from doing so. <br />We cannot make a recommendation as to the best location for the memorial but we are <br />clearly not in support of building it on Site 1. <br />Thanks, <br />Harry and Sandra Jensen <br />14781 Krypton Ct. NW <br />Ramsey, Mn. 55303 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.