My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 04/14/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:57:30 PM
Creation date
4/9/2009 12:53:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/14/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Hunt stated that most of what is being said tonight is the importance of wetlands. <br />There is no question about that. In repealing this ordinance it wouldn't be touching the wetland <br />at all, it would be taking away the buffer. He stated he is not sure where he would stand on the <br />thought of it being a taking of land. An aggressive tree ordinance is in place. It is not right to <br />say that this ordinance doesn't get challenged very often; maybe it doesn't get challenged very <br />often because it is not economically feasible to challenge it. <br />He would like to stay with the Ramsey type process rather an here <br />a decision for a Council recommendation. <br />Jim Overtoom, 16660 Jaspar Street NW. Mr. Ove <br />the health and welfare of the residents of the ci <br />to protect the health and welfare of the city b <br />wetland, open spaces to some extent, withou <br />residents of the city, yet protecting the rights of eve <br />Mr. Overtoom stated he is in favor of the ordinance. <br />the setbacks that he lives with on his property. <br />Chairperson Nixt left the meeting at 8:39 <br />Chairperson Next returned to the meeti <br />-218 — <br />Jamie Schurbon, Anoka County <br />ordinance. He stated that for an <br />take all or substantially all <br />important aspects of an ordr" <br />The ordinance is also cons s <br />property own <br />their pro <br />scienc <br />con <br />Comm. <br />expertise. <br />Mr. Schurbon state <br />that can be your buffer, <br />then do a replanting. He <br />fights; li <br />is no <br />erva ion <br />.ance to b <br />ue or use o <br />d stated that t <br />Planning Commission /April 2, 2009 <br />Page 7of13 <br />at a public hearing making <br />ces are in place to protect <br />s ordinance is in place <br />thdges of the <br />y all of the <br />dinance is no different than <br />k on what he sees as a successful <br />regulatory taking, it would have to <br />rty. He continued talking about the <br />s ordinance does include those aspects. <br />t e Wetland Conservation Act. He stated that it is true all <br />have duties as well. One of those duties is to manage <br />ublic health and environment. He spoke on the <br />the ordinance scientific aspects are good and <br />compromise in the ordinance rather than just throwing out <br />Mr. Schurbon for attending the meeting and giving of his <br />f buffers are allowed or recommended. <br />E :.ically there are two types of buffers, one with noxious weed present <br />'th some management like mowing, second if you have noxious weeds <br />stated what is in our ordinance supports either version. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.