Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Levine, to recommend the City Council <br />not adopt the ordinance to repeal the wetland buffer ordinance and in lieu thereof recommends <br />the City Council direct the establishment of a collaborative process to involve the citizens of the review <br />City, selected members of boards and commissions wetland buffer ordinanc may be <br />the wetland buffer ordinance and determine ways in which the <br />modified so`that it doesn't fail in its essential purpose, but enhances flexibility to land owners <br />and the city to use the wetland buffer ordinance as a land management tool. <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes:. Chairperson Nixt, Comm t die, Cleveland, Hunt, and <br />Van Scoy. Voting No None. Absent: Commissio Bra e . a gers. <br />Case #4: Request for Sketch Plan Revie <br />Associate Planner Gladhill presented the staff repo <br />Commissioner Van Scoy, assumes the bluff height <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated that woul <br />DNR and they suggest that the land be <br />Foster is aware of there not being muc <br />brought forward it will have to stay wit <br />There are no new accesses being .oposed. <br />conies forward. The flood plan :o throw <br />come forward <br />This is a minor plat so ther <br />— <br />anner Gladhill ex <br />ential we co 1 <br />Xing for <br />Associat <br />forwar, <br />pur <br />bi <br />than <br />open are <br />Foster, the p <br />Associate Planner <br />construct a senior livin <br />tated <br />ecause <br />urchase <br />lic hearing. <br />um ption. en forwarded on to the <br />d Unit D opment. He stated Mr. <br />this parcel and when a site plan is <br />de. <br />onto Xkimo Street when site plan <br />ap'amendment when the site plan <br />e agreement was signed in 2006. The City is going <br />ay 47 upgrades and access would have to be <br />reement did not require any certain type or rental <br />d that if this were zoned Planned Unit Development rather <br />otiate some terms for the development, such as protecting <br />ns in parking requirements. We can not require that of Mr. <br />just suggest. <br />state that Mr. Foster has related to the City that he would like to <br />omplex. <br />This is not a public hearing; however, Chairperson Nixt entertained public comments. <br />Planning Commission /April 2, 2009 <br />Page 9of13 <br />