My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/21/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 04/21/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 9:33:06 AM
Creation date
4/17/2009 7:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
04/21/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />;"\" <br /> <br />3.3 Residential.Roadway <br /> <br />3.3.1 Residential Roadway Discussion <br /> <br />The current text for residential roadway is reprinted below. <br /> <br />Statute 169.01, Subd. 81. Residential Roadway. IIResidential <br />roadway" means a street or portion of a street that is less than one- <br />half mile in length and is functionally classified as a local stl'eet.by <br />the road authority having jurisdiction. <br /> <br />ThecoroUary,point to iliisdefmition is that cities may seta 25 MPRspeed limit on a <br />residential roadway, without a speed study, if adopted by the road. authority having <br />jurisdiction over the residential roadway (see MS 169'.14 Subd. 2(a)(7)). <br /> <br />This definition in the statute was originally scaled to one-quarter mile length roads <br />(I.e., truly short roads or cul-de-sacs), but at a later date the text was altered to one- <br />half mile to encompass an exception condition. The Task Force spent a considerable <br />amount of time discussing the merits and application of the residential roadway <br />provision. Because of the vague terminology "street or portion of street~" some Task <br />Force members expressed concern over potential misapplication of the residential <br />roadway provision. Informal observations indicate that some cities do make more <br />frequent use of this provision. However, even with more frequent use oithe <br />provision, it is impractical for incorrect use to occur due to the signing requirements <br />that are part of the statute. When implementing a 2S wlPH speed limit under this <br />provision, cities are required to install speed limit signs at the beginnh1g and end of . <br />the, residential roadway. This requirement makes it impractical to attempt to.lengthe1'1 <br />, the 25 :MPH zone beyond the half-mile limit set in the statute. <br /> <br />It was also acknowledged in the Task Force meetings that if the basic statutory speed <br />limit for urban districts were to change to 25 .MFR, then this residential roadway <br />definition would become irrelevant and should be removed from statute. <br /> <br />Several options were developed in the Task Force in an attempt to clarify the <br />definition and limit the possibility that this provision could be implemented <br />incorrectly. A guiding point in reaching a decision was the idea that the original <br />intent of the Residential Roadway provision was to apply to entire (short) roads, not <br />to segments within continuous roads. The Task Force decided to return to that <br />intended usage. The Task Force recommendation is to delete "or portion of a street" <br />. from the provision to clarify the text. If changed in that way, the statute would <br />clearly only apply to. truly short roads. <br /> <br />With the proposed change in the statute text, the element that includes "a porti011 of a <br />street" would no longer apply. This means that roadway segments, as opposed to a <br />complete length of road under a half mile, that have been signed as 25 MPH zones <br />under 169.14, Subd. 2 (7) would no longer be eligible to retain the 25 MPH status <br />solely on the Residential Roadway basis. These zones, and the corresponding <br /> <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.