My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 04/28/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:58:03 PM
Creation date
4/23/2009 1:09:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/28/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Levine, to recommend the City Council <br />not adopt the' ordillance to repeal the wetland buffer ordinance and in lieu thereof recommends <br />the City Council direct the establishment of a collaborative process to involve the citizens of the <br />City, selected members of boards and commissions as they deem appropriate to further review <br />the wetland. buffer ordinance and determine ways in which the wetland buffer ordinance may be <br />modified so that it doesn't fail in its essential purpose, but enhances flexibility to land owners <br />and the city to use the wetland buffer ordinance as a land management tooL. <br /> <br /> <br />Motion Cirrried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Comm' <br />Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissi <br /> <br />e, Cleveland, Hunt, and <br />ers. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Revie <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill presented the staff rep <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy, assumes the bluff height <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated that woul <br />DNR and they suggest that the land be <br />Foster is aware of there not being mu <br />brought forward it will have to stay wit <br /> <br />There are no new accesses be' <br />comes forward. The flood pI <br />come forward <br /> <br />onto Xkimo Street when site plan <br />ap amendment when the site plan <br /> <br />agreement was signed In 2006. The City is going <br />ay 47 upgrades and access would have to be <br />eement did not require any certain type or rental" <br /> <br />d that if this were zoned Planned Unit Development rather <br />otiate some terms for the development, such as protecting <br />ns in parking requirements. We can not require that of Mr. <br />Just suggest. <br /> <br />Associate Planner <br />construct a senior livin <br /> <br />state that Mr. Foster has related to the City that he would like to <br />mplex. <br /> <br />This is not a public hearing; however, Chairperson Nixt entertained public comments. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 2, 2009 <br />Page 9 of 13 <br /> <br />-159- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.