Laserfiche WebLink
<br />CASE # L/ <br /> <br />ADOPT ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS <br />By: Tim Rimmer, City Engineer <br />Chris Anderson, Environmental Coordinator <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Ramsey has been identified as one of the largest users of non-consumptive water in the metro area. In <br />an attempt to reduce the quantity of water used annually, the City has considered and implemented <br />various conservation measures over the years. There have been several iterations of a topsoil <br />requirement considered by both the PublIC Works Committee and the Environmental Policy Board, <br />dating back to January of 2006. At the July 15, 2008 Public Works Committee meeting, staff was <br />directed to prepare a topsoil ordinance requiring a minimum of four inches of topsoil, meeting MnDOT <br />specification 3877.2C (premium topsoil borrow), in landscaped areas of all new developments <br />(residential and commercial/industrial). <br /> <br />After further research, staff modified the recommended topsoil specification slightly, to more <br />specifically address the soil conditions found in Ramsey, and brought it before the City Council for <br />introduction on January 13, 2009. At that meeting Council made additional revisions to the proposal <br />and requested that it be brought to a work session to resolve any issues prior to adoption, which was <br />done on April 7,2009. At that meeting samples were presented, along with a price break down of each, <br />and aJist of suppliers that could produce the material. It was determined by the Council that instead of <br />producing a specific blend meeting MnDOT specifications, we should be looking to define in more <br />general terms the City's requirements for topsoil. <br /> <br />Observations: <br />The sandy soils found throughout the City have low water retention capacity, thus large quantities of <br />water are used each year for irrigation. Generally speaking, the topsoil in the City consists of silty sand <br />with minimal organics and clay content. Therefore, establishing a. topsoil requirement should increase <br />the soil moisture holding capacity of the soil, due to the higher amounts of organics required. Based <br />upon investigation and discussions with some local suppliers, the additional financial impacts of this <br />proposed ordinance would equate to approximately $1,000 for.a standard % acre residential lot, and <br />$2; 200 per acre for an industrial/commerciallot. This new topsoil requirement would be triggered by <br />the issuance of a building permit for new construction of a principal structure. The benefits realized <br />from.requiring topsoil would include reduced demand for non-consumptive water, improved recharge of <br />aquifers, and lower utility bills for residents as a result of less frequent watering. . <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance requires the installation of a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil over all <br />exposed areas not improved with buildings and paving, excluding natural areas that are left undisturbed. <br />The topsoil requirement would apply to any lot, in any zoning district, being improved with the <br />construction of a principal building. From direction at the April 7,2009 work session the revised topsoil <br />definition is proposed to be: "Black dirt composed of unconsolidated material, largely undecomposed <br />. organic matter that is a suitable foundation for vegetative growth. The composition of the topsoil <br />shall include a well balanced medium consisting ofthefollowing: <br />· A maximum sand/silt content of 20% <br />· A minimum organic content of 35% <br />· A pH between 6 and 7 <br />· Removal of all rocks in excess of 3/4" <br /> <br />-163- <br />