My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/26/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 05/26/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 3:59:24 PM
Creation date
5/21/2009 11:33:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/26/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Administrator Ulrich went through a Power Point presentation of the Settlement highlights <br />on positioning on how this positions the Ramsey Town Center for the Future. He reviewed the <br />community's initial vision for a 322 acre, award winning mixed -use development along <br />Highway 10. He stated that the initial vision included creation of a Master Development <br />Agreement and the property was owned by a private developer. He noted the successes that have <br />happened in the Ramsey Town Center such as PACT, 223 units of life cycle housing, Coborn's, <br />the transit hub and a City Park. He reviewed some of the challenges since 2006, including the <br />death of the developer and bankruptcy, which resulted in about 150 acres being trapped in the <br />foreclosure process. He stated that the land is currently owned by 25 banks, which has <br />complicated negotiations. He reviewed. some of the potential risk in both moving forward and <br />not moving forward. He stated that the proposed action is a settlement of litigation where the <br />City will purchase 148.2 acres at a cost of $6.75 million, which secures a marketable title, with a <br />closing date of June 26, 2009. He reviewed the map of where the property is located, and noted <br />that 61.3 acres is commercial land; 51.8 acres is residential; and 30.9 acres is parkland. He <br />stated that this would help position Ramsey for the future because it frees the property for <br />development, pays back taxes, builds a tax base and reduces the need for future tax increases. <br />Councilmember Look publicly thanked everyone on the Council for the countless hours spent in <br />meetings that have taken them away from their families to hammer out details and get answers to <br />questions. He stated that he also wanted to thank staff for their continued work in updating the <br />Council as things have changed. He stated that this project may not end up having one developer <br />taking the project and running with it, so it may need to be parceled out. He stated that this was <br />probably the last option that the City would consider but it will help control the use of the land. <br />He stated that his plan is to sell this property at the price that we paid, if not a profit and thinks it <br />is important for the citizens to understand that this is going to be done through an internal loan <br />transfer, not a bailout in terms of people's taxes paying for this project. He stated that with $6.75 <br />million, the City will net about $500,000 in back taxes and will be able to apply a $1.5 million <br />Letter of Credit, which brings it down to about $4.5 million from the internal loan. He stated <br />that it will also allow the City to bring forth a Met Council grant for an amphitheater that would <br />have just fallen apart if this purchase hadn't moved forward. He stated that this is an investment <br />in the future of the City. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that there have been hundreds of hours between the Council and the <br />staff working on this, which also has certain costs associated with it. He stated that he has <br />historical perspective on this project, having been around to see the various stages. He stated <br />that because the City created a very stringent Development Agreement this will allow us to get <br />the things that the City wants here. He stated that you have to ask "But for not the City" whether <br />this thing would fly and he feels that it wouldn't fly without the City getting involved. He stated <br />that he commends the Council for this difficult decision and he understands it will be <br />contentious, but he is very impressed with the Council and the tenacity of questions and the <br />thought process throughout the discussions. <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that the Council needs a vision and the- only way to position the <br />City in this vision, was to purchase this. He stated that he thinks this option was the last resort <br />for everyone. He stated that he thinks the other important issue is for the City to continue <br />fighting and pursuing the transportation issue and the potential train stop. <br />Special City Council Meeting /March 17, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.