Laserfiche WebLink
<br />May 10, 20091 Volume 3\ No.9 <br /> <br />Zoning Bulletin <br /> <br />See also: National Advertising Co. v. Town of Niagara, 942 E2d 145 (2d () <br />Cir. 1991). ~ <br /> <br />Case Note: The court distinguished between "Chapter 251's prefer- <br />ence for certain tecooologies regardless of site location and regula- <br />. tions from other municipalities that examined aesthetic. concerns <br />with regard to appliCll-tioris and set forth specific technologies to be <br />used on specific sites. It said "that Chapter 251's preference for al- <br />ternate technologies regardless of site "interfered with the Telecom- <br />munications Act's pervasive scheme in a way that [the other regula- <br />tions]... [did] not." <br /> <br />--------- <br />." 1 <br />! <br /> <br /> <br />@ 2009 Thomson Reuters <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br /> <br />~__" ___. ._~~.... .._~____ _ _"... . J <br /> <br />( ) <br />'-----..---- <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />82 <br />