My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/04/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 10:00:20 AM
Creation date
5/29/2009 2:56:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/04/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />All of the lessons learned about density <br />come into play in the city's most popular <br />neighborhoods. However, the popularity of <br />neighborhoods changes over time. To suc- <br />cessfully plan for neighborhood change, we <br />argue that you must monitor how neighbor- <br />hoods are changing and try to anticipate <br />the next "hot" neighborhood. If you ca'1 <br />anticipate neighborhood change, then you <br />can direct growth to locations that db not <br />completely disrupt the existing neighbor- <br />hood context. <br />We recommend monitoring potential <br />change~using a quick and dirty metric we <br />cal.l the "fun index." Chicago has a large <br />population of young people who are highly <br />mobile. This population is ready to move to <br />neW neighborhoods as rents change and <br />as other neighborhClods become known <br />as "hip." <br />The index is simply defined as the <br />estimated square footage of all bars and <br />restaurants in the neighborhood divided <br />by the total number of neighborhood resi- <br />dents. This equation calculates a square <br />footage of bar and restaurant floor space <br />per neighborhood resident-the higher the <br />. ratio, the higher the fun index. <br />To illustrate the fun index let's look at <br />Chicago's Wicker Park neighborhood and <br />Lakeview community. <br /> <br />" Wicker Park <br />Wicker Park is a compact area (0.78 square <br />miles) bounded by Churchill Street on the <br />l'!orth, A~hland Avenue on the east, Division <br />Avenue on the south, and Western Avenue <br />on the west. <br />Wicker Park is part of the much larger <br />WestTown Community Area. Piecing to- <br />gether the different census tracts, Wicker <br />Park has a year 2000 population of ap- <br />proximately'lS,OOO people. Nearly half of <br />all residents in WickerPark are aged 20 to <br />34, while this age group makes up only 27 <br />percent of the population citywide. Within <br />the Dound'a'ries ofthe Wicker Park neigh. <br />borhood, a Google maps search identified <br />more than 90 restaurants, bars, delis, <br /> <br />88 <br /> <br />sandwich shops, take-out restaurants, and <br /> <br />coffee shops. Using the fun index formula: <br /> <br />Ninety bars and eating spots multiplied <br />by 3,000 square feet(estimated aver- <br />age amount of floor space) divided by <br />15,000 people equals a fun index of 18 <br /> <br />square feet of fun per resident. <br /> <br />The index underestimates Wicker <br /> <br />Park's fun characteristics because it does <br /> <br />not incorporate a'measure of art gallery <br /> <br />and artist studio space. Each fall studios in <br /> <br />the neighborhood are opened to the public <br /> <br />for the Around the Coyote art festival. <br /> <br />o Lakeview Community Area <br /> <br />Lakeview is a much larger area. The com- <br /> <br />munity area contains 12 different neighbor- <br /> <br />hoods, and the highest density is on the <br /> <br />east side where all, neighborhoods abut <br /> <br />Lake Michigan. <br /> <br />Lakeview has a youthful look. The <br /> <br />2000 census reported that approximately <br /> <br />50,000 of the nearly 95,000 Lakeview <br /> <br />residents were between the ages of 22 and <br /> <br />34. Ac~ording to the census, the median <br /> <br />age for the neighborhood was 30 and the <br /> <br />average hou.sehold size was 1.65 persons,' <br /> <br />among the lowest in the city. <br /> <br />In 2004 the various chambers of com- <br /> <br />merce conducted a detailed survey of busi- <br /> <br />nesses within the community. The survey <br /> <br />identified 167 dining locations including <br /> <br />restaurants, coffee shops, delicatessens, <br /> <br />take-out restaurants, and specialty food <br /> <br />shops. In addition, the survey identified 89 <br /> <br />bars, induding bars that served food. Us- <br /> <br />ing the fun index formula: <br /> <br />Two hundred fifty-six bars and eating <br />spots multiplied by 4,000 square feet <br />(Lakeview bars and restaurants' are <br />estimated to be larger than those in <br />Wicker Park because of the influence <br />of Wrigley Field and the lakefront <br />park) divided by 94,815 people <br />equals a fun index'oh1 square feet <br />of fun per resident. <br /> <br />The Lakeview's index also underesti- <br /> <br />mates the neighborhood's fun. Lakeview is <br /> <br />home to many of the city's small live the- <br /> <br />aters"which are a major neighborhood draw. <br /> <br /> <br />projects generate instant appeal and renown. <br />Locals appreciate the extra effort expended to <br />save beloved and threatened -neighborhood <br />buildings that might not technically be worthy <br />of landmark designation but that function as <br />such in the community. The people who move <br />in value the unique features and prized loca- <br />tion oftheir new homes. The influx of resi- <br />dents grows the market for local businesses. <br />Opposition to such projects on the basis of <br />too much density is generally ni!. <br />Unlike larger structures, many single- <br />lot-wide storefronts have been successfully <br />converted to residential use by persons hav- <br />ing no prior experience in rehabilitation. <br />Taking note of a trend among smaller historic <br />commercial buildings and wishing to promote <br />it further, Chicago's planning department <br />produced Converting Storefronts to Housing <br />in 1996 (republished as PAS 472). Though it <br /> <br />Historic structures <br />help promote <br />tourism, and <br />historic preservation <br />is one of the ultimate <br />expressions of <br />sustainable design. <br /> <br />addresses buildings of all sizes, its focus is on <br />how to adapt the storefront for living space. ' <br />To streamline the zoning proc,"ss, in 2004 <br />Chicago created a new B2 classification which <br />allowed ground floor residential use as-of- <br />right. Prior to that, storefront housing required <br />a special use permit from the Zoning Board of <br />Appeals. <br />The advantages of living (and working at <br />home) in a converted storefront, department <br />store,. or factory are legion for those who pre- <br />fer lots of light, high ceilings, solid construc- <br />tion, and adaptability. For the neighbors and <br />even for those just passing through, the reuse <br />of a ~tructure helps preserve the collective <br />memories of a community and hands them on <br />to the next generation. The ornate detailing <br />and materials of the past are not likely to be <br />recaptured in new construction. <br />Historic .structures help promote tour- <br />ism, and historic preservation is one of the <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTICE 5.09 <br />AMERICAN PUlNNING ASSOCIATION Ipage 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.