Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />AUDIT SUMMARY <br />The following is a summary of our audit work, key conclusions, and other information that we consider <br />important or that is required to be communicated to the City Council, administration, or those charged <br />with governance of the City. <br />UNDERSTANDING THE AUDITOR'S RESPONSIBILITY <br />Our responsibility, as stated in our engagement letter and as described by professional standards, is to <br />plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, but not absolute, assurance about whether the financial <br />statements are free of material misstatement and are fairly presented in accordance with accounting <br />principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Because an audit is designed to provide <br />reasonable, but not absolute, assurance and because we did not perform a detailed examination of all <br />transactions, there is a risk that material misstatements may exist and not be detected by us. Our audit of <br />the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. <br />As part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the City. Such considerations were solely for <br />the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such <br />internal control. <br />As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material <br />misstatement, we performed tests of the City's compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, <br />contracts, and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance <br />with such provisions. <br />PLANNED SCOPE AND TIMING OF THE AUDIT <br />We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously discussed and coordinated <br />in order to obtain sufficient audit evidence and complete an effective audit. <br />AUDIT OPINION AND FINDINGS <br />Based on our audit of the City's financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008: <br />• We have issued an unqualified opinion on the City's financial statements. <br />• We noted no matters involving the City's internal control over financial reporting that we <br />consider to be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. <br />• The results of our testing disclosed no instances of noncompliance that are required to be reported <br />under Government Auditing Standards. <br />• There was one Minnesota Legal Compliance Finding in the current year. Minnesota Statute <br />§ 118A.03 requires that if a city's deposits exceed federal insurance coverage, excess deposits <br />must be covered by corporate surety bonds or collateral that has a market value of at least <br />110 percent of such excess. This requirement was not met for one of the City's accounts at <br />December 31, 2008. <br />