Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilmember Dehen asked if acquisition of the Oasis was part of the cost estimate for <br />Armstrong upgrade. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that it was part of that cost estimate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated that he is an advocate of getting Armstrong Boulevard fixed, but <br />agrees that the $1.14 million price is over-inflated. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson gave a brief review of the amended JPA and the construction <br />obligations. <br /> <br />Mayor Ramsey stated that when the JPA was done in 2005, he thinks the intent was to move <br />forward with the right of way, not a full purchase, along Armstrong near the Oasis, which is why <br />the cost was only estimated at $500,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig noted that the Public Works Committee looked at having this area redone <br />and the cost estimates came in around $5 million, so they suggested postponing this project so <br />our dollars can be used as part of a larger project. He stated that the County supported that and <br />the City also went to the legislature for design/build funds, which were received. He stated that <br />he is disturbed about the Oasis Market coming in at $1.14 million, which he didn't expect at all. <br />He stated that he thinks good points were made about the process, but the RTC, as it is right now, <br />has returned $1 million per year in revenue, so there is some return coming to the City. He <br />stated that he doesn't like the price tag, but is in favor of this because he wants to see the project <br />go forward and has hopes that the City can re-sell the property in the future. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson reviewed the reasons why the Oasis property became a full <br />acquisition rather than just right-of-way acquisition. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Ramsey, seconded by Councilmember :Elvig, to Adopt Resolution #09-07-147 <br />Approving the Terms of$I,140,000 Internal Loan in Connection with TIF District No.4. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Councilmember Elvig stated that he feels the City is somewhat caught in the <br />situation that the Met Council is in with RALF funds. Councilmember Look stated that his issue <br />is one of timing because the City will not be building out Armstrong anytime soon and yet it will <br />spend this money to acquire the land. He stated that he thinks it is irresponsible to be taking <br />properties years ahead of when it is necessary. Councilmember Dehen asked what would happen <br />if the City doesn't approve this reso~ution. City Attorney Goodrich stated that the County may <br />sue the City. Mayor Ramsey noted that the Purchase Agreement has been drafted and the <br />property owner has already signed it and spent money completing the environmental projects <br />that the County requested be completed. Councilmember Dehen stated that he only wants to <br />approve this if there is some way that the Armstrong project can move forward right away. <br />Public Works Director Olson stated that it can be completed, but would have to be done with <br />City money. He noted that at the public meetings, in October, it was discussed that this project <br />should not move forward with interim improvements, but to wait and pursue the overpass option. <br />Councilmember Elvig stated that he agrees and doesn't want to go backwards and do interim <br />improvements rather than an overpass. He reviewed the direction that the Council gave to staff <br /> <br />City Council / July 14,2009 <br />Page 12 of 19 <br />