Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning Manager Miller stated there could be a provision of the permit that there could be no <br />construction debris or material. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dunaway questioned the pile of dirt in the picture included in the staff report. It <br />. . has weeds growing on it~.which indicates it has been there for awhile. <br /> <br />Mr. Lofgren stated he brought that in for his personal use and hasn't had the time or money to <br />use it for the purposes intended. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy read the concerns from a letter received in opposition of the permit. <br /> <br />Barb Anderson, 5421 165th Lane, stated the neighborhood is well kept and this is an eye sore in <br />this residential area. . She stated even with fencing it would look like a business. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Hunt, seconded by Commissioner Dunaway, to close the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Levine, Commissioners, Hunt, Dunaway, Cleveland, <br />Rogers, and Van Scoy; Voting No: None. Absent: None. <br /> <br />The public hearing closed at 9:31 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />The nature of the business and the number of equipment on the property are concerns to the <br />commissioners. Screening would be .necessary if approved. <br /> <br />Planning Manager Miller stated this case is slightly different than the others with the amount of <br />equipment, outside storage and the size of the lot. <br /> <br />. Discussion ensued regarding outside storage, screening, and findings of fact. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated he can not see how a construction business can be compatible <br />with a residential neighborhood. <br />Associate Planner Gladhill explained that the city became aware of this business from a code <br />enforcement complaint. He continued explaining the code enforcement procedures. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt questioned if these items were snowmobiles, boats; trailers, etc. would it be <br />in compliance. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated it would be in compliance and the key, is that those items would <br />be personal use. <br /> <br />Commissioners went through findings of facts; finding #22, will not; #23 will not; #24 will not, <br />#25 will not; #26, may; #27 split into two findings - may be hazardous and will be disturbing; <br />#28 will; #29 will not and will not; #30 will not and will not. <br /> <br />Planning Commission! August 6, 2009 <br />Page 8 of 12 <br /> <br />P8 <br />