My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 09/15/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2009
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 09/15/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 9:34:46 AM
Creation date
9/10/2009 4:37:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
09/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. PEDSAFE : recommended guidelines/priorities for sidewalks and walkways <br /> <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />._:.,:"""..:'~,~-.c.",~"-;;., <br /> <br />safety and enhance the economic viability of these areas. <br />8. Other Pedestrian Generators- Hospitals, community centers, libraries, sports arenas, and other public places <br />are natural pedestrian generators where sidewalks should be given priority, <br />9. Missing links-Installing sidewalks to connect pedestrian areas to each other creates continuous walking <br />systems. <br />10. Neighborhood Prloritles~ Local residents may have a sense of where the most desirable walking routes exist. <br />Neighborhood groups or homeowners associations can provide a prioritized list of locations where they see a <br />need for sidewalks. Agencies should be cautious about using this criterion, as It Is not desirable to let <br />neighborhood pressure override addressing a key safety concern. However, it may be useful to monitor requests <br />from pedestrians with disabilities. <br /> <br />B. Methodology <br />The two recommended methodologies for selecting <br />locations for improvements are: (1) the overlapping priorities <br />method, and (2) the points method. Establishing priorities <br />should consume only a small percentage of a program <br />budget-the level of effort put Into prioritization should be <br />proportionate to the size of the capital budget. <br /> <br />There Is no single right way to select which criteria to use <br />when developing priorities. The criteria and methodology <br />should balance safety measures, such as vehicle speeds <br />and pede~trian crash data; pedestrian usage measures, <br />such as proximity to schools or commercial areas; continuity <br />between origins aria destinations; and accessibility for <br />pedestrians with disabilities. <br /> <br />1. Overlapping Priorities Method- The easiest and <br />cheapest way to identify overlapping priorities is.through <br />graphical representation; the Intent is to identify locations <br />that meet multIple criteria. This methodology is especially <br />useful In cases where there is not a lot of staff time and <br />funding for detailed analysis. It can be accomplished using a <br />GIS system or It can be done by hand. <br /> <br />The best way to describe this methodology Is by example. <br />Assume that priorities are going to be developed based on <br />transit routes, proximity to schools, people with disabilities, <br />and neighborhood commercial areas. Start with a map of <br />your Jurisdiction, Using a color pen, identify those arterials <br />that have high transit use; clraw a half~mlle circle around <br />every elementary school and around locations that attract <br />people with disabilities; and color In the neighborhood <br />commercial areas. This visual approach will make areas of <br />overlapping priorities become Immediately clear. The streets <br />without sidewalks within the overlapping areas are the <br />highest priority for retrofitting sidewalks. <br /> <br />2. Points Method- A weighted points system can be used <br />where staff time and funding are available for more detailed <br /> <br />htto://www. walkinginfo. org/pedsafe/moreinfo sidewalks. cfm <br /> <br />Seattle example <br />Seattle recently completed an Inventory of all sidewalks in <br />the city using a three-step process: <br /> <br />1. An Intern was hired to review aerial photographs to <br />determine whether a sidewalk existed. This <br />Information was then recorded as a new layer on <br />the existing GIS street database. <br />2. The Intern field-checked all locations where there <br />was some uncertainty regarding the presence of a <br />sidewalk (about 10 percent of the aerial <br />photographs were not clear). <br />3. Each of 13 neighborhood groups that cover the <br />city were given a draft copy of the Inventory and <br />were asked to check for errors. <br /> <br />The total effort took the equivalent of one full-time person <br />working for 6 months in a city of 530,000 population, 218.3 <br />km2 (84.3 m12) of land use and 2.659 roadway kilometers <br />(1,652 roadway miles) [1,934 residential street kilometers <br />(1,202 residential street miles) and 724 arterial kilometers <br />(450 arterial miles)]. Once the Inventory was completed, <br />the Information was combined on a map with three other <br />types of Information: <br /> <br />1. School Walking Zones: A colored circle Identified a <br />half-mile area around each school. <br />2. Pedestrian Generators: A second color was used <br />to identifY a half-mile area around key pedestrian <br />generators, such as hospitals, libraries, and <br />community centers. <br />3. Nelghborhoo'd Commercial Areas: A third color <br />was used to IdentifY the dozen neighborhood <br />commercial areas In Seattle (about one for each of <br />the major neighborhood areas). <br /> <br />Once the map was printed, It was very easy to see where <br />the three colors overlapped, two colors overlapped, etc. <br />The final step was to have the computer calculate the <br />sidewalk deficiencies In the overlapping areas. They <br />found, for example, that there were less than 3 km (2 ml) <br /> <br />8/19/2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.