My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/22/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 09/22/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:20:48 PM
Creation date
9/17/2009 4:20:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/22/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
284
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CASE # ~,p <br />INTRODUCTION OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 9 OF CITY CODE, <br />RELATED TO THE DEFINITION OF TOPSOIL <br />By: Tim Himmer, City Engineer <br />Background: <br />As a-means of water conservation, the City adopted a new topsoil ordinance on Apri128, 2009. The <br />existing ordinance went into effect on June 8, 2009, and includes the following: <br />• The installation of a minimum of four (4) inches of topsoil over all exposed areas not improved <br />with buildings andpaving, excluding natural areas that are left undisturbed. <br />• The topsoil requirement would apply to any lot, in any zoning district, being improved with the <br />construction of a principal structure. <br />• Topsoil is defined as "black dirt composed of unconsolidated material, largely undecomposed <br />organic matter that is a suitable foundation for vegetative growth. The composition of the <br />topsoil shall include a well balanced medium consisting of the following: <br />o A maximum sand/silt content of 20% <br />o A minimum organic content of 3S% <br />o A pH between 6 and 7 <br />o Removal of all rocks in excess of 3/4" <br />During adoption of the topsoil ordinance staff discussed an approach to pre-certify soil in an attempt to <br />make the change easier for builders and contractors in locating the material, as well as for inspections and <br />enforcement by City staff. During the precertification process staff negotiated with our geotechnical <br />consultant to test samples for us at no cost. <br />Attempts have been made to contact local suppliers requesting a sample of the material they market for <br />potential inclusion on our list distributed to builders and contractors at the time a building permit is <br />issued. Currently four (4) suppliers have submitted a total of seven (7) samples for review, three (3) <br />others have stated that they are interested in participating but have yet to submit samples, and one (1) has <br />submitted their testing information in an attempt to become an approved supplier. Only one (1) sample <br />meets the current definition of topsoil; however that sample was submitted last year and is no longer <br />available. <br />Observations: <br />Staff was concerned about the lack of suppliers and material that meets our current ordinance so a case <br />was brought forward for discussion at the Public Works Committee on July 21, 2009. The direction from <br />that meeting was to amend the topsoil definition within Section 9.02 of City Code to reduce the minimum <br />organic content to twenty-five percent (25%), and increase the maximum allowable sand content to thirty <br />percent (30%). <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing related to this proposed amendment on September 3, <br />2009. There were no persons in attendance to speak to this matter, but one letter in opposition to the <br />amendment was accepted into the record and there was much discussion by the Commissioners. The <br />biggest issues raised at that meeting were: <br />• Whether the City should be participating in certifying the soil. <br />• Whether the requirements were too restrictive and therefore caused a hardship for builders and <br />developers (creation of a "Ramsey mix"). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.