Laserfiche WebLink
PEDSAFE : recommended guidelines /priorities for sidewalks and walkways Page 11 of 12 <br />2 Number of driveways: To comply with ADA, many existing driveways must be replaced with ones that provide a <br />level passage at least 0.9 (3 ft) wide. It can also be advantageous to inventory all existing driveways to see if any <br />can be closed, resulting in a cost- savings. <br />3. Number of intersections: While intersections represent a reduction in the sidewalk, curb ramps are required <br />where sidewalks cross Intersections and the cost of providing additional traffic control at each intersection should <br />be considered. <br />4. Obstacles to be removed: The cost for moving or removing obstacles such as utility poles, signposts, and fire <br />hydrants vary too much to be itemized here; however, they are required to be moved if they obstruct access, <br />These costs must be calculated Individually for each project. <br />5. Structures: While minor sidewalk projects rarely involve new structures such as a bridge, many projects with <br />significant cuts and fills may require retaining walls and /or culvert extensions. The costs of retaining walls must <br />be calculated Individually for each project. <br />6. Right -of -way: While most sidewalk projects can be built within existing rights -of -way (especially infill projects), <br />some may require some right -of -way easement. An alternative to acquiring right -of -way is to narrow the <br />roadway, which should consider the needs of bicyclists (e.g., through bike lanes or shoulders, at a minimum of <br />1.5 m (5 ft). <br />7. Miscellaneous factors: Planters, irrigation, benches, decorative lampposts, and other aesthetic Improvements <br />cost money, but they are usually well worth it if the impetus for the project is to create a more pleasant and <br />inviting walking environment. <br />When project costs appear to be escalating due to one or more of the above - listed items, especially retaining walls or <br />acquiring right -of -way, consideration may be given to narrowing the sidewalk in constrained areas as a last resort. The <br />full sidewalk width should be resumed in non - constrained areas --this is preferable to providing a narrow sidewalk • <br />throughout, or dropping the project because of one difficult section. <br />Tips to Reduce Total Costs: <br />1. Stand -alone vs. Integrated within another project: Sidewalks should always be included in road construction <br />projects. Stand -alone sidewalk projects cost more than the same work performed as part of a larger project. <br />Sidewalks can be piggybacked to projects such as surface preservation, water or sewer lines, or placing utilities <br />underground. Besides the monetary savings, the political fallout is reduced, since the public doesn't perceive an <br />agency as being inefficient (it is very noticeable if an agency works on a road, then comes back to do more work <br />later). The reduced Impacts on traffic are a bonus to integration. <br />2. Combining Projects: A cost- savings can be achieved by combining several small sidewalk projects into one big <br />one. This can occur even if the sidewalks are under different jurisdictions, or even in different localities, If they <br />are close to each other. The basic principle Is that bid prices drop as quantities increase. <br />Bibliography and List of References <br />American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, A Policy on Geometric Designs of Highways <br />and. Streets, 1984. <br />Axelson, P. et al., Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC, July <br />1999. <br />Institute of Transportation Engineers, Design of Pedestrian Facilities_ Recommended Practices: Providing Safety <br />and Mobility, 2001. • <br />http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe/moreinfo_sidewalks.cfm 8/19/2009 <br />