My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:22:28 PM
Creation date
10/22/2009 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the discussions have taken place, then, pick the option that would work the best. It seems <br />premature to try to pick an option at this point. <br />City Administrator Ulrich stated that this is primarily what gets conveyed to the residents with <br />their tax information. He recommended against setting it high unless Council is trying for the <br />maximum in flexibility. He added .that the direction to staff from Council was to lean more <br />toward being fiscally conservative. <br />Councilmember Look inquired of the different options presented, to which Finance Officer Lund <br />summarized the options as follows: Option 1: Tax rate same as 2009; Option 2: 2009 tax rate + <br />limited staff reductions; Option 3: Zero percent property tax increase /limited staff reduction; <br />Option 4: Market - Value Homestead Credit restored and limited staff reductions; Option 5: <br />Same levy as 2009; and Option 6:. Maximum levy allowed for 2010. <br />Councilmember Look stated that when a property value goes down, people know their tax <br />amount should go down as well - so you are waiting for that decrease. When we are pitching a <br />zero percent impact but you do not see a decrease in taxes, it's hard to say we are keeping it the <br />same when in actuality it would go up. <br />Councilmember Elvig questioned if Council decides to not take the full levy, do we lock <br />ourselves in future years. <br />Finance Officer Lund explained that the starting place for next year will be our levy and <br />explained the process. <br />City Administrator Ulrich interjected these are State imposed levy limits and that we can levy <br />back market value homestead credit loss. <br />Councilmember Elvig expressed concern about the levy limit issue — we keep going down and <br />down and down. <br />Mayor Ramsey stated that if property values go back up, then we will be "out of the woods" so <br />to speak. If we cut back for next year, what will happen to us if the property value starts to go <br />UP. <br />Ms. Lund replied then the tax rate will go down — the levy is based on dollar amounts. <br />Councilmember Uehen cautioned we need to be careful to not just think about how cheap we can <br />get things done. He liked the idea of saving money too, but he was concerned about it as well, <br />Ms. Lund explained page 2 of her hand out and described how staff got it down to a balanced <br />budget, <br />Councilmember McGlone stated that we have equity in property and believed there would be a <br />change for the positive in the future; we have untapped resources. <br />City Council Work Session <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.