My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2009
>
Agenda - Council - 10/27/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 4:22:28 PM
Creation date
10/22/2009 12:30:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/27/2009
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
235
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION <br />1) Update on hunker lake Boulevard Reconstruction (2011) <br />Director of Public Works Olson reviewed the staff report. <br />Jason Orcutt, Anoka County Engineering Supervisor, reviewed the Bunker Lake Boulevard <br />traffic statistics, the proposed reconstruction, and how the County was proposing to work with <br />the public to inform the public of the reconstruction process. <br />Councilmember Look asked if the County had prepared an analysis of the amount of traffic on <br />local roads. <br />Jack Corkle, Anoka Count Sr. Transportation Planner, responded an analysis had been prepared <br />and she would send the analysis to the Council for review. <br />Councilmember Dehen asked if concrete medians would be put in for the roads being closed and; <br />if so, would those medians have landscaping and irrigation. He stated he did not like the <br />concrete look. <br />Mr. Orcutt responded landscaping or colored concrete would be the City's responsibility .to pay <br />for. <br />Councilmember Wise expressed concern if hard channels were put in, those channels would <br />affect the local businesses. He requested hard numbers as to why the City needed hard <br />channelization instead of center turn lanes. <br />Councilmember Elvig agreed with the hard channel points brought up by Councilmembers <br />Dehen and Wise. He expressed the concern that by shutting down access points it would affect <br />the entire area. He stated he wanted easy access to neighborhoods, which the plan did not do. He <br />recommended the County look at a right -in, right -out at Iodine instead of closing it. <br />Councilmember Jeffrey stated he also had concern about the accesses and being able to get to the <br />local businesses. He stated the lanes had to be widened if U -turns were permitted also. <br />Councilmember . Elvig believed the signals were also not timed correctly to allow U -turns to be <br />made safely, <br />Mayor Ramsey stated he was opposed to hard channelization; the businesses would not survive <br />with hard channelization, He asked if the City was locked into anything. <br />Public. Works Director Olson noted at 116th and Sunfish, the Council could signalize the <br />intersection at the City's expense. He indicated if the Council turned down this project, the <br />County could pull the project and use the funds in another area within the County. He noted it <br />had been the County's policy to put in hard channelization for years. <br />City Council Work" Session / September 15, 2009 <br />Page 2 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.