My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/02/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2009
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 11/02/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:21:22 PM
Creation date
10/30/2009 3:29:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
11/02/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Step #8: Adapt Maintenance <br />The pruning of boulevard trees can be very time consuming if the trees receive <br />the kind of work that is necessary to increase their longevity. For example, <br />pruning for proper branch structure and apical dominance helps a tree to <br />withstand ice and storm damage. However, this may not be the best use of <br />resources for a tree species that will not be around for the long term future. <br /> <br />Recognizing that the arrival of EAB is just a matter of time, Forestry Division <br />crews are spending less time pruning ash trees that other types. Ash tree <br />pruning now consists of two basic steps. These are the removal of low limbs that <br />interfere with pedestrian and vehicle traffic as well as the removal of deadwood. <br />The time saved pruning ash trees can be spent on longer lasting species. <br />Ironically, one of these is the disease resistant elms that show promise in tough <br />urban settings. <br /> <br />Step #9: Stop Planting Ash <br />The loss of thousands of elm trees to DED in the late 1970s caused a need for <br />inexpensive yet fast growing trees that could endure tough city conditions. This <br />resulted in the unintentional over planting of ash trees by home owners and <br />municipalities. Unlike many cities and villages, Minneapolis adopted a Master <br />Street Tree Planting Plan (MSTPP) in the early 1980s. This helped ensure <br />species diversity and limited the number of ash planted on public properties. <br /> <br />Over time the MSTPP developed into a dynamic document. Species that were <br />prescribed in the 1980s proved unsuitable over the next twenty years. Even <br />when following the MSTPP, the number of ash on boulevards and in parks <br />increased. It was not uncommon for the MPRB to plant over 300 ash each year. <br />With the realization of EAB's destructive nature, the Forestry Division reduced <br />the number of ash planted to 44 in 2005 and 9 in 2006. Since 2007, no ash trees <br />have been planted by the MPRB. <br /> <br />Step #10: Replacement <br />The perfect scenario for any urban forest would be one in which there were no <br />disease or insect pest to deal with. However, even in this ideal setting there <br />would still be a need to remove aging trees and replace them with new ones. <br />This is because much of an urban forest is manmade. Without replanting, the <br />urban forest would suffer from senescence and eventually die off. <br /> <br />One of the goals in the battle against EAB is to slow the insect's arrival to <br />Minnesota for as long as possible. During that time, there are ash trees that will <br />reach the end of their life cycle and need to be replaced. The MPRB Forestry <br />Division will use this opportunity to replace ash with other species. <br /> <br />Other opportunities for ash replacement will also be pursued. These include <br />situations where ash was probably not the best choice at the time of planting. <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.