Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Brauer. secdnded by Commissioner Watson to recommend <br />Council adopt findings of fact relating to a request from _~noka Tec~cal Co!~,9.~'~' for an i~t~m <br />use pemfit to use the exisung land as an unimproved parking lot, to have ~'6~storage, and to <br />use an existine buiidin.~ for educational ~u~oses. ~:'~"" ~'~": <br /> <br />Motion camed. Voting Yes: Acting Chai~erson Jonson, Co~issio~s Brauer, W~on. ~d <br /> 'ir' :'- · V <br />Shepherd. Vo~in~ No: None. Absent: Chai~erson Nix~, Co~Joner %~,gc.o . <br /> <br />Morion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Co~iss~ner Wat~'~ to ~eco~end that <br />Council approve the request from .~oka Tec~cal Co~e~e ~or an inte~ use pe~it touse~ ~e~:?" <br />exis~in~ land as an ummproved parking lot, to ha~e'~';:~mdoor s~or~e~ and to use ~. e,~ <br />buildin~ ~or educational pu~oses. -"?" <br /> <br />~ocio~ ea~ed. Votin~ Yes: Acfin~ Chai~erson Jo~so~:::~Co~issionecs Brauer, Watson, and <br />Shepherd. Votin~ No: None. Absem: Chai~erson Nix~. Co~is~ioner Van 8~oy. <br /> <br />Case ~2: Request ~or Conditional Use Petit to Exceed s~(e Res~ri'~fions ~or Accessory <br /> Structures; C~se o:f Gerald Sch~dt :~ <br /> <br />Presentation ~%.~ ~ <br />Associam Pla~er Geisler advised ~h:e Ci~ has ~cei've~--~ application from Gerald and Karen <br />Sc~idt for a conditional use pe~i~ ~o exceed~.~the de,ached ~cc~sso~ building s~ze res~cfions <br />established in City Code on the prope~ located a~ 15243:¥a~a Stree~ N~. She stated the <br />subjec~ prope~y ~s approximately 37,000.~ square feet in si~e, and City Code res~c~s accesso~- <br />buildings co L,488 squ~e feet on parcels~ ~s size. ~e applic~cs are proposing ~o cons~ct a <br />detached aecesso~ bui~ that'would be:.;~l~080-square feet. Based on the ex~s~in~ accesso~ <br />square ~ootage, the new'building would exceed ~he allowable tom/~or the p~cel by 456 square <br />rec,.. S~e stated the app~cams ~-e ~equesfin~i~e additional squ~e footage to cons~c~ a buiidin~ <br />co s~ore the applicant's mo'~orhome, boats~::~d ohher prope~. <br /> <br />AssociaLe Plarmer'Geisler further advised the proposed detached accessory building will comply · <br />with ail of the setback reqmremenrs and accesso~ structure hei_~ht restnct~ons established in Ci~7 <br />Code. City Code reqmres accessory structures ro march the finish material on the dweltmg or <br />have meza] panels that are coior comoafibie. She noted the applicants' home is stucco, so the <br />applicant is proposin! vm~q or hardboard siding for the accessory s~rucmre ahat will be the same <br />coior as the home. S2~e indicated S~a~~ recommends ~anring the request for conditional use <br />permit. <br /> <br />Public EIearinz <br />Motion by Cormrfissioner Brauer. <br />hearing, at, 7:32 p.m. <br /> <br />seconded by Corm:nissioner Shepherd to close the public <br /> <br />~0~on carried. Voting Yes: Actin~ Chairperson Johnson. Co~ra-nissioners Brauer. Sheoherd <br />and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Nixt, Corm~issioners Reeve and Van · <br /> <br />Scov. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 7, 2003 <br /> Page 4 of 19 <br /> <br />-173- <br /> <br /> <br />