Laserfiche WebLink
CASE <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW; <br />CASE OF B,~ILDLNG FASTEN-ERS, i-NC. <br />By: Amy Geisler, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Background: <br /> <br />Building Fasteners, Inc. is proposing .to construct an addition to an existing manufacturing <br />building on the property located at 7100 Sunwood Drive. <br /> <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br /> <br />a) <br /> <br />c) <br />d) <br />e) <br /> <br />Site location map <br />Site plan <br />Building elevations <br />Draft Planning Commission minutes dated August 7, 2003 <br />City Staff review letter dated August 1. 200~, revised August <br />Development permit <br /> <br />Notification: <br /> <br />'Site Plans do nor require a public hearing. <br /> <br />Observations: <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to an existing manufacturing building at <br />the corner of Sunwood Drive and Jaspar Street NW. The property is zoned E-1.Employment <br />(under the new zoning districts, to take effect August 25, 2003). Manufacturing facilities are <br />a permitted use in this district.. The site plan is proposing to develop an addition with a <br />30,757-square-foot footprint that will include 30,757 square feet of manufactUring space and <br />2,578 square feet of office space. Th'e lot in question is approximately 3.3 acres in size. Lot <br />coverage is restricted to 45% or approximately 65,644 square feet. The proposed'tSuilding's <br />footprint (existing and addition) is approximately '62,161 square feet. The proposed site plan <br />meets the required frqnt, rear, and side yard setbacks. <br /> <br />The landscaping plan is generally acceptable, but additional trees and shrubs will be required <br />to fully meet Cirv Code requirements. The proposed addition appears to meet architectural <br />standards fbr finish materials. <br /> <br />Additional information on storm water discharge locations is required as to location of <br />discharge and amount. The plan has been revised to eliminate one of the loading docks on <br />the addition; this revision addresses staff concerns about potential semi-trailer truck <br />maneuvering on the site. <br /> <br />83- <br /> <br /> <br />