My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2009
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2009
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/03/2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:43:53 PM
Creation date
11/17/2009 9:48:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/03/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />stated that the ordinance allows for topsoil from the site that is moved to be reused on the site <br />and questioned if the four inches of topsoil would be required for the entire site. <br /> <br />Environmental Coordinator Anderson explained that the purpose of the ordinance is water <br />conservation. He advised that staff could approve the use of a legitimate restoration plan, with <br />sod or prairie grass, in lieu of the four inches of top soil for the entire site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt confirmed that someone could mix compost with existing topsoil to meet <br />the City standards. He questioned what an estimated cost for the topsoil would be. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that for an average quarter acre lot the cost would be an additional <br />$1,200 to $1,500. He stated that the average cost for soil is $3.00 to $8.00 a yard, compared to <br />the City mix, with a cost of$12.00 to $15.00. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dunaway questioned how the soil could be certified if someone were to mix <br />compost material with the existing topsoil. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that staff could test the soil that was mixed to ensure that it meets. <br />the standard. He stated that staff was not trying to be too restrictive and wanted flexibility within <br />the ordinance. He explained that the City did not previously have an ordinance. He stated that <br />staff would like homeowners to understand the effect of topsoil on water conservation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated that he was more concerned with the certification process, as he was <br />not aware of any other City that tests the soil quality themselves. He stated that he believed that <br />the people putting in the soil should provide the certification to the City as he did not think that <br />the City should be involved in the certification process. He advised that while he was not in <br />favor of lowering the amount of organic matter he ultimately did not see the difference as a huge <br />change and would agree with the amendment. <br /> <br />Commissioner Dunaway stated that staff had worked with the first builder through this process <br />and questioned if that could be discussed. <br /> <br />City Engineer Himmer stated that at this point the people have taken the information and do not <br />complain until the time of occupancy. He explained that complaints have been received when <br />the builder has to pay for the soil. He stated that staff has attempted to work with builders <br />upfront but has not received comments until the time of occupancy. He explained that the City <br />felt, by completing the certification of the soil themselves and providing a list of suppliers, they <br />would be saving builders' time. He eXplained that by amending the ordinance it would allow for <br />a larger market of available soil. <br /> <br />Commissioner Cleveland advised that she was comfortable with the ordinance requiring a certain <br />amount of black dirt to help with water retention. She stated that she understood that this <br />requirement would aid in water retention and help the grass to retain water. <br /> <br />Planning Commission / September 3, 2009 <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.