Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Brauer summed up that there are no employees, three vehicles used for the <br />business, and no work done onsite. He asked how much storage is planned for the site. <br />Mr. Kriens stated he has cleaned up the site and what is there now is the maximum he would <br />have on site. He has three trailers onsite. <br />Chairperson Van Scoy asked what the intent was for the screened area. <br />Mr. Kriens explained his screening plan. <br />Assistant City Engineer Jankowski showed and explained wetland violation to the <br />Commission. He read an email from the Anoka Conservatio a fis which stated they do not <br />know the extent of the violation at this time and it has not be '4,i,Tesolve ._ <br />Associate Planner Gladhill stated staff is recommendi there be some clew up of the site for <br />approval to be given. If we look at the amount o 'o tside storage maybe this : So thing that <br />would fit with the current ordinance; as it looks t ?`'" a taff would not recommen pp oval. <br />Planning Manager Miller stated it is the volume of the vat " ial and less so the screening and <br />having the material consolidated in one are <br />Motion by Chairperson Van Scoy, second br I) away, to close the public <br />hearing. <br />Motion Carried. Voting4 <br />Hunt, and Rogers. of <br />Cleveland. <br />The public hearin <br />CommisS Busine <br />ice ChairpersQVan Scoytommissioners Dunaway, Brauer, <br />None. AbVent: Chairperson Levine and Commissioner <br />Motion b' %; • mmissioner o raper, , sec,oKded by Chairperson Van Scoy, to recommend that City <br />Council as istVindings of 'Act relating to the Applicants' request for a Home Occupation <br />Permit. <br />Further Discussion , <br />yam <br />Discussion ensued on fhelanguage for the findings of fact. <br />Amended motion by Commissioner Brauer, seconded by Chairperson Van Scoy to recommend <br />City Council adopt Findings of Fact relating to the Applicant's request for a Home Occupation <br />with Findings of Fact #26 to read: "That the City finds that the Home Occupation operates <br />beyond the intent and parameters of 9.11.04 (Home Occupations) and finds that the Home <br />Occupation is not low -level and is not typically compatible in a residential district" and upon <br />approval of the City Attorney. <br />