My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
01/19/10
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
>
Agendas
>
2010's
>
2010
>
01/19/10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2025 2:58:44 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 11:05:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Housing & Redevelopment Authority
Document Date
01/19/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the office market who were dealing with the large end user. He indicated he was also on various <br />Boards and worked on programs through these Boards as well. <br />Mr. Hart stated people know who Solomon was and Solomon did not need to market themselves <br />and this has value for the City. <br />Commissioner Wise stated he was concerned about the transportation issues and the location of <br />Highway 10 and the railroad tracks. He believed this needed to be fixed one way or another. He <br />asked what Solomon could bring to this to find funding. <br />Mr. Johnson responded Solomon had worked closely with MnDOT and Counties in the past and <br />Solomon had had experience in working with issues such as this. He believed the train stop was <br />a big plus for this area. <br />Commissioner Jeffrey arrived at 6:00 p.m. <br />Darren Lazan, Landform, introduced Skip Greeby and Michael Greeby, of Greeby Companies, <br />and Ryan Cronk of Cronk RE, LLC. <br />Mr. Lazan presented what he believed the project was and where the project should go. He <br />indicated the next steps would be to organize, political lobbying, and development management. <br />Michael Greeby stated whatever developer the City decided on needed to be able to take this to <br />the next step. He stated Greeby Companies wanted to take this to the next level and with the <br />proper organization structure, this could be accomplished. <br />Mr. Lazan summarized the team strengths including local presence, national reach, depth of <br />resources, and service-based approach. <br />Skip Greeby stated Greeby Companies needed to convince the City to retain them for this <br />project. He stated a couple of reasons why is that Greeby Company has gotten to know a lot of <br />City staff and Council over the past few years and from a local and national view Greeby would <br />be able to tap resources from developers as well as giving the City visibility of the project. He <br />stated Greeby would be able to promote the project on the national stage, which was a great <br />advantage for the City. <br />Chairperson Dehen stated he was not sold on the developer management concept because it <br />created another layer. He asked what this team would bring over and above what the staff could <br />accomplish. He asked if the advantage was the contacts Landform had. He asked if there was <br />anything else in the marketing aspect over and above these contacts. <br />Mr. Lazan responded the City staff was very talented and energetic. He believed contacts was a <br />big advantage, but he also believed Landform brought a deeper and broader understanding of the <br />deal, and development, as well as an understanding of what would fit into Town Center. <br />Housing and Redevelopment Authority /December 15, 2009 <br />Page 3 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.