02/04/10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

~ississippi Critical River Overlay District in Section 9.21 and the reduced setback terms ~stablished in the variance granted to the Subject Property in Resolution 97-08-189. 9. That City Code allows fora total of 1,800 ,square feet of garage 'and accessory buildings on the S~bject Property; the existing attached garage is 825 sq~are feet in size; the proposed, garage is 576 square feet in size, for a total of 1,401 square feet of garage and accessory building space. lb., That the Applicant has stated the reas~ning for requesting an accessory structure closer to the, front property line than the principal structure, herein attached as Exhibit A. 11. That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally apply to other properties in the district; namely, the Subject Property is in the Crhical River , Overlay District and the Subject Property is also subject to variance t~rms established'in Resolution #97-08-189. ..' 12. That the special conditions do not result from the actions ofthe Applicant. . ' .' . , ' . .' 13. That the literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicant of rights c,ommonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, nlimely the right to have additional garage space on the premises., ' . . 14. That the varIance requested is the niinimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. . ' 15. That if granted, the -variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and. air to adj acent property. 16. That if granted, the variance will not tmreasonably increase the congestion in the public. street. 17. That if granted, the variance willl,Iot increase the danger offire or endanger the public safety. 18. That if granted, the variance will not unreasonably diminish property values in the neighborhood. :, 19. That if granted, the variance will not violate the 41t~:nt of the Comprehensive Plan. 20. That, if granted, the variance will not grant ~e Applicant any special privileges that ,are denied tq other owners of land in the s~edistrict. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Board Member Levine, ~d upon vote being taken thereon, the foll6~g voted in favor thereof: Chairperson Van Scoy Board Member Levine Board Member Cleveland Board Member Hunt , " Board l\1ember Rogers RESOLUTION #08-07-118 Page 2 ofj 37